Teams

SSH RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-02vs HW TEALWon 41
L#1 DoublesBlair Weber / Kellie Naclerio vs Mellenie Goebel / Vickie Lasseter1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTamiko Norris vs Barbara Superka6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Cabot / Heidi Peterson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesFauna MacKillip vs Tiffanie Lenderman6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Catherine Zeberlein vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-30vs GAC PURPLELost 23
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Blair Weber vs Samantha Schwartz / Rhonda Lynn Jackson1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesTamiko Norris vs Alex Kaminsky0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStacie Sonius / Kellie Naclerio vs Mary DuBois / Rhonda Buder6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesFauna MacKillip vs Reana Kaminsky1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDorothy Carr / Catherine Zeberlein vs Tracy Sickels / Patsy Botts6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-05-09vs WC REDWon 41
L#1 DoublesDorothy Carr / Catherine Zeberlein vs Emily Lewis / Juli Simmermon6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesTamiko Norris vs Arijana Barun6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacie Sonius / Kellie Naclerio vs Becca Rinn / Kathryn Cullen6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesFauna MacKillip vs Bonnie Baker6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBlair Weber / Elizabeth Freestone vs Jenny Yotter / Brooke Lorenz6-2, 6-2
2022-05-02vs PTC PINKWon 41
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Blair Weber vs Michelle Keck / Lisa Walko6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesFauna MacKillip vs Debra Sherwood6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Dorothy Carr vs Alyson Tittman / Caren Swan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesTamiko Norris vs Karen Terry6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStacie Sonius / Lisa Cabot vs Dawn Larson / Laura Routh6-2, 6-3
2022-04-25vs SSLT GOLDWon 41
W#1 DoublesKellie Naclerio / Stacie Sonius vs Meredith Beveridge / Angie Van Wyk6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFauna MacKillip vs Kayla Gosz5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Dorothy Carr vs Sara Haynes / Brooke Wolf6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesBlair Weber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Lisa Cabot vs Carol Berg / Kimberly Jester6-1, 6-1
2022-04-18vs HFII ORANGEWon 41
W#1 DoublesKellie Naclerio / Stacie Sonius vs Amanda Nelson / Danielle Drohan1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesFauna MacKillip vs Laura Moche3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Freestone / Blair Weber vs Su Zemla / Erika Troyer7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTamiko Norris vs Maren Plisko3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Zeberlein / Dorothy Carr vs Stephanie Tomeo / Rachel Nance6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LEBTC GREEN6129618255
2LTA BLACK51181228249
3BTA NAVY51181229267
4SSH BLUE52231233281
5CACM YELLOW42181230253
6BVP GREEN42161431257
7CACI NAVY33131739285
8GPTC BLACK34161943340
9SKY GREEN34142146324
10SSH RED24141636258
11MEA PURPLE24121840288
12CVTA GREY24121841300
13MEA NAVY15121842299
14CR RED15102043278
15HRCA RED16142143312
16ATC BLUE16102552359
17DTC SILVER0682247326

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Blair Weber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.27
Elizabeth Freestone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Fauna MacKillip
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Erica Giesen
published 3.5
3.06
Stacie Sonius
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.05
Lisa Cabot
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Catherine Zeberlein
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.83
Dorothy Carr
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.72
Kellie Naclerio
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.58
Heidi Peterson
published 3
Tamiko Norris
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacie Sonius + Blair Weber4258% games+10.0% vs expected
Catherine Zeberlein + Blair Weber22562% games+6.8% vs expected
Dorothy Carr + Elizabeth Freestone10360% games+6.4% vs expected
Stacie Sonius + Kellie Naclerio421758% games+4.0% vs expected
Dorothy Carr + Catherine Zeberlein191160% games+2.8% vs expected
Elizabeth Freestone + Blair Weber11260% games+2.4% vs expected
Catherine Zeberlein + Erica Giesen10755% games+2.2% vs expected
Dorothy Carr + Erica Giesen15958% games+2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blair Weber
83W–29L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Freestone
163W–103L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Fauna MacKillip
158W–112L career · 6 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Erica Giesen
74W–50L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Stacie Sonius
86W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Lisa Cabot
60W–54L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Catherine Zeberlein
165W–97L career · type A · 6 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
3
Dorothy Carr
125W–82L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Kellie Naclerio
121W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Heidi Peterson
12W–32L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
Tamiko Norris
39W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.