Teams

Skehan-Geriatric Tennis Junkies 26-MNW

*2026 Adult 65 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 NoHo Women · 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 9 9:00 AM
Memorial Northwest Swim & Racket Club
Sep 16 9:00 AM
Kingwood Country Club
Sep 23 9:00 AM
Kingwood Country Club
Sep 30 9:00 AM
Bentwater Country Club Tennis Center
Oct 7 9:00 AM
Memorial Northwest Swim & Racket Club
2026-09-02vs Smith-Lethal Lobbers-KCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesSherry Bonds / Elizabeth Hensley vs Patty Matson / Helen Irion6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAlice Campbell / Jacquelyn Winters vs Susan Descioli / Beth MacE1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesEunice Skehan / Julie Wallison vs Pamela Acosta / Diane Chisam6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Davis-Deuce It Out-Bentwater000000
2Meyer-Meyer KCC000000
3Skehan-Geriatric Tennis Junkies 26-MNW000000
4Smith-Lethal Lobbers-KCC000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Julie Wallison
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Carol Buonfiglio
published 3.5
3.40
Eunice Skehan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alice Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Jacquelyn Winters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Esther Davis
published
3.12
Carol Viecelli
published 3.5
Elizabeth Hensley
published
Jeanne Houston
published
Liz Heasley
published
Margaret Shockley
published
Sherry Bonds
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanne Houston + Carol Buonfiglio404 matchesnot enough data
Liz Heasley + Carol Buonfiglio314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Wallison
17W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Carol Buonfiglio
24W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.47
Eunice Skehan
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Alice Campbell
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Jacquelyn Winters
5W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Esther Davis
4W–6L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Carol Viecelli
10W–20L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Elizabeth Hensley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jeanne Houston
6W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Liz Heasley
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Shockley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sherry Bonds
13W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.