Teams

8FAC-MAHMOOD Winter Team Singles 4.5+ MEN SEM

2024 zSEM WINTER TEAM SINGLES · 2024 MEN 4.5+ WINTER SINGLES SEM

4 players · average NTRP 4.50 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
L#1 SinglesJohan Mahmood vs Jason Chen4-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesStefan Buerkle vs Steven Demps1-1
L#1 SinglesJohan Mahmood vs Cheng Gong4-6, 2-5
W#2 SinglesGilles Carnoy vs Jonathan Martin6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJohan Mahmood vs Noah Gedrimas3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNichola Stojanov vs John Hughes6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesGilles Carnoy vs Trenton Townsend6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesNichola Stojanov vs Xiaoqiang Li6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesGilles Carnoy vs David Lai6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesNichola Stojanov vs John Andrew6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesStefan Buerkle vs Steven Gallagher3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesJohan Mahmood vs Brian Nguyen0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesNichola Stojanov vs David Pusdesris6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesGilles Carnoy vs Jonathan Martin7-6, 6-0
W#3 SinglesNichola Stojanov vs Tomie Tomotaka6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJohan Mahmood vs John Hughes3-6, 4-4
W#2 SinglesGilles Carnoy vs Noah Gedrimas6-4, 2-2
W#1 SinglesGilles Carnoy vs Rohit Srinath6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesNichola Stojanov vs Steven Millard6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesJohan Mahmood vs Brendan Childress2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesGilles Carnoy vs Robert Walker6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesNichola Stojanov vs Mark Petit6-2, 5-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 2024 MEN 4.5+ WINTER SINGLES SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
18FAC-MAHMOOD Winter Team Singles 4.5+ MEN SEM82181224218
25EAST-KEAN Winter Team Singles 4.5+ MEN SEM73191126221
37LIFE-BEARD Winter Team Singles 4.5+ MEN SEM73191126223
42PEACH-DEMPS Winter Team Singles 4.5+ MEN SEM46131733267
54SCWB-KUROSAWA Winter Team Singles 4.5+ MEN SEM46131738268
63DEER-TOWNSEND Winter Team Singles 4.5+ MEN SEM37111939287
76BT-SRINATH Winter Team Singles 4.5+ MEN SEM1962450307

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.07 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Nichola Stojanov
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.83
Johan Mahmood
usually #1 Singles 83%, also #3 Singles 17% · published
Gilles Carnoy
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Stefan Buerkle
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nichola Stojanov
64W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
4.32
Johan Mahmood
120W–52L career · 6 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.83
Gilles Carnoy
23W–12L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stefan Buerkle
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.