Teams

BAIN-Ferguson

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-04vs CAC/SL-Match Points-NguyenWon 30
W#1 DoublesJames Ferguson / Tom Crowley vs Charles Kim / Peter Kim-Himmelfarb4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRoan Blacker / Adam Rabinowitz vs Lloyd Sandquist / Tri Dang7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrendan Peters / Aaron Beal vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-05-14vs PSC-IpSplit 22
W#1 DoublesConnor Rice / Brogan Rice vs Bhanu Purohit / Kevin Ying2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Ferguson / Tom Crowley vs SALVADOR AVILA / Radha Kotamarti4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBrendan Peters vs Andreas Ohrbeck4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAaron Beal / Adam Rabinowitz vs Jacob Mann / Timur Sadykov2-6, 4-6
2022-05-07vs BTA-ClownTown-SiebertWon 32
W#1 DoublesConnor Rice / Brogan Rice vs Ryan Hung / Zhiheng Zhu6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBrendan Peters vs Yodae Lim6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJames Ferguson / Roan Blacker vs Brandon Nakata / Lawrence Hwang2-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAdam Rabinowitz vs Chris Hsu7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAaron Beal / Steven Curtis vs Sonny Lim / Kevin Kang6-3, 7-6
2022-04-30vs EDG-HiraiWon 21
L#1 DoublesEvan Ferguson / Brad Jelinek vs Manato Hirai / Brian Namba7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesConnor Rice / Brogan Rice vs Jim Tjelle / Victor Pajek1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTom Crowley / Adam Rabinowitz vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-23vs MC-Cobra DaiLost 03
L#1 DoublesConnor Rice / Brogan Rice vs Cuong Ngo / Ken Wong1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEvan Ferguson / Brendan Peters vs Lynn Maung / Thadeus Cacanindin2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAaron Beal / Alejandro Henao vs Ivan Pare Des / Jordan Hill0-6, 2-6
2022-04-16vs BC-Breakers-Antezana/Parcel 4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJames Ferguson / Evan Ferguson vs Brian Fong / Scott Griff1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrendan Peters / Alejandro Henao vs Jeff Chaney / Chris Barry3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesConnor Rice / Brogan Rice vs Alex Peters / Marin Guillet7-5, 6-4
2022-04-09vs TCSP-BridgemanLost 03
L#2 DoublesAndrew Block / Evan Ferguson vs Chris Bridgeman / Matthew Johnson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAdam Rabinowitz vs Ali Hashim3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRoan Blacker / Brendan Peters vs Nathan Hambley / Brady Gustafson2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.75 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Andrew Block
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.01
Nick Bicknell
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Singles 22% · published
3.88
Connor Rice
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Alejandro Henao
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Tom Crowley
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Brendan Peters
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.60
Roan Blacker
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Steven Curtis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
James Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Adam Rabinowitz
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 0
Evan Ferguson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Roan Blacker + Brendan Peters2350% games+1.8% vs expected
Roan Blacker + Tom Crowley10751% games−0.4% vs expected
James Ferguson + Tom Crowley5354% games−1.3% vs expected
Roan Blacker + Steven Curtis6754% games−8.1% vs expected
James Ferguson + Roan Blacker61045% games−13.6% vs expected
Roan Blacker + Adam Rabinowitz2453% gamesnot enough data
Tom Crowley + Adam Rabinowitz5164% gamesnot enough data
James Ferguson + Brendan Peters213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Block
19W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%44%56%
4.02
Nick Bicknell
60W–26L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Connor Rice
23W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Alejandro Henao
13W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Tom Crowley
47W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Brendan Peters
26W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Roan Blacker
130W–99L career · 3 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Steven Curtis
19W–51L career · type S · 1 line in 2022
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
James Ferguson
43W–68L career · 4 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.48
0
Adam Rabinowitz
33W–21L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Evan Ferguson
5W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.