Teams

NJD/Mercer Mennis

Adult 65 & Over Summer · 7.0 Men Super Senior

15 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NEW JERSEY

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-16vs MishitsWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Cirasola / Steven Pellerin vs Mark Pollack / John Pagano5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-08-15vs MishitsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSam Saad / Michael Cirasola vs Donald Hardman / Ramaswami Venkatesh6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesGary Lindenbaum / John Hoffman vs Stephen Giamboi / Steven Yglesias4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-15vs MishitsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Cirasola / Steven Pellerin vs Mansour Rismanchi / Stephen Moser2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZion Chen / John Hoffman vs Francisco Franco / Xiping Song7-5, 6-1
2026-08-14vs MishitsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichael Cirasola / Sam Saad vs John Pagano / Mansour Rismanchi6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSteven Pellerin / Kelly Fife vs Steven Yglesias / Stephen Giamboi6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men Super Senior have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Steven Pellerin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Phill Karali
published
3.29
Michael Cirasola
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Andrew Jubelt
published 3.5
Andy Goodman
published 3.5
Gary Lindenbaum
published
Harbir Ransi
published
John Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Fife
published
Micheal Leung
published
Ram Kapil
published
Richard Digeorgio
published
Sam Saad
published
Zion Chen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Cirasola + Phill Karali5159% games+4.2% vs expected
Steven Pellerin + Kelly Fife7265% gamesnot enough data
Steven Pellerin + Michael Cirasola303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Constantini
42W–20L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
Steven Pellerin
61W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Phill Karali
76W–64L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Michael Cirasola
145W–107L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Andrew Jubelt
3W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Andy Goodman
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Gary Lindenbaum
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Harbir Ransi
12W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
John Hoffman
78W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Fife
21W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Micheal Leung
15W–34L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Ram Kapil
24W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Richard Digeorgio
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sam Saad
6W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Zion Chen
5W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.