Teams

SD 3.5 Lake Murray TC (2:3)/ Hartman

2024 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-11vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ PadillaLost 01
L#2 SinglesKelli Sandman-Hurley vs Cynthia Hensersky3-6, 2-6
2024-05-31vs SD 3.5 LJTC (3:2)/ UyedaLost 01
L#2 DoublesColleen Hartman / Kelli Sandman-Hurley vs Sarah Bruno / Christina George-Bill1-6, 4-6
2024-05-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKelli Sandman-Hurley vs Julie Wood3-6, 0-6
2024-05-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKelli Sandman-Hurley vs Jessica Cunningham3-6, 2-6
2024-04-23Won 10
W#1 SinglesKelli Sandman-Hurley vs Michelle Adams6-3, 7-6
2024-04-16vs SD 3.5 Mtn View (3:2)/ SaenzLost 01
L#1 SinglesKelli Sandman-Hurley vs Paola Romo4-6, 1-6
2024-04-09vs SD LLW 3.5 WD SDTRC/ MonzonLost 01
L#1 SinglesKelli Sandman-Hurley vs Amy Hamric4-6, 1-6
2024-04-02vs SD 3.5 Coronado TC (2:3)/ SchmiedLost 01
L#1 SinglesKelli Sandman-Hurley vs Margaret Holland2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Gretchen Myers
published 3.5
3.25
Kathy Tyburski
published 3.5
3.24
Colleen Hartman
published 3.5
2.92
Kelli Sandman-Hurley
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
Julie Drake
published
Kristen Miller
published
Lynn Muradian
published
Michelle Simpson
published
Peggy Peloquin
published
Yvonne Garrett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelli Sandman-Hurley + Peggy Peloquin0631% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Simpson + Colleen Hartman134 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Miller + Michelle Simpson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gretchen Myers
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Kathy Tyburski
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Colleen Hartman
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Kelli Sandman-Hurley
3W–15L career · 8 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
2.92
Julie Drake
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristen Miller
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lynn Muradian
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michelle Simpson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Peloquin
0W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yvonne Garrett
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.