Teams

3*JByrd-Eno

2024 Eno River Tri-Level-18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men Wknd

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-21vs 2*CMoffitt-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSergii Porokh / Alex Piasecki vs Ari Farber / Justin Frye7-5, 1-2
W#2 DoublesNikita Poujai / Conner Garrison vs Tanner Dellinger / Dash Rajarajhan6-3, 6-2
2024-07-20vs 6*AYoung-EVLost 01
L#1 DoublesKwame Owens / Sergii Porokh vs Seth Layton / Tevin Wilson2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-06-29vs 1*PBream-UNCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeron Russell / Kwame Owens vs Chris Mansfield / Laurence Isaacs4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-22Won 10
W#1 DoublesSergii Porokh / Ryan Berliner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-01vs 8*PHariharan-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesEduardo Schlotterhausen / Nikita Poujai vs Kiran Ramaswamy / Jeff Friday2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.52
Kwame Owens
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.46
Parv Mital
published
4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Jeron Russell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Sergii Porokh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Ryan Berliner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Alex Piasecki
published 4
3.66
Conner Garrison
published 4
3.65
Nikita Poujai
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
3.37
Casey Collins
published 3.5
3.30
Kevin Williams
published
PHI PHAM
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jermaine Byrd + Kwame Owens4355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kwame Owens
168W–56L career · 10 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.52
Parv Mital
26W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 4 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
4
Jeron Russell
142W–90L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Sergii Porokh
106W–114L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Ryan Berliner
113W–104L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Alex Piasecki
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Conner Garrison
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
4
Nikita Poujai
122W–61L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Eduardo Schlotterhausen
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
3.5
Casey Collins
22W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.37
Kevin Williams
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.30
3
Christopher DeFusco
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
PHI PHAM
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.