Teams

Marcotte/FS/CM

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 2 League · 3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-13vs Moore/FS/CMWon 30
W#1 DoublesDzung Vu / Sam Hanna vs David Moore / David Humphrey6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChol Hyun Park vs Josh McGuire6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrandon Richmond / James Willis vs Roberto Tarin / Josh Carroll6-0, 6-2
2026-03-24vs Moore/FS/CMWon 41
L#1 DoublesNathan Marcotte / Mark Hoskyn vs David Humphrey / David Moore7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesVarun Gampa vs Josh Carroll6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrandon Richmond / Robert Remy vs Curtis Abbott / Alan Carlisle7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesShane Irgens vs Josh McGuire6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLarry Isch / James Willis vs Tuong Phan / Roberto Tarin6-3, 6-1
2026-03-10vs Moore/FS/CMWon 50
W#1 DoublesChol Hyun Park / Robert Remy vs David Humphrey / David Moore3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNathan Marcotte vs Alan Carlisle6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLarry Isch / Charles Warren vs Josh Carroll / Curtis Abbott6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesVarun Gampa vs Roberto Tarin6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBernie Manard / James Willis vs Josh McGuire / Martyn Parker6-4, 6-4
2026-03-05vs Parks/FS/CMWon 41
L#1 DoublesChol Hyun Park / Larry Isch vs Jacob Frueh / Riley Palmer6-1, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRobert Remy vs Michael Tursky6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMark Hoskyn / Charles Warren vs Steve Drake / Brooks Leding6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSam Hanna vs Thai Tran6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesBernie Manard / James Willis vs Dusan Stojanovic / Brandon Oneal7-5, 6-2
2026-02-26vs Parks/FS/CMWon 40
W#1 DoublesNathan Marcotte / Robert Remy vs Jacob Frueh / Riley Palmer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChol Hyun Park vs Thai Tran6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBrandon Richmond / Mark Hoskyn vs Brooks Leding / Steve Drake6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesShane Irgens / Varun Gampa vs Brandon Oneal / Chad Parks7-6, 6-1
2026-02-19vs Parks/FS/CMWon 32
L#1 DoublesDzung Vu / Nathan Marcotte vs Riley Palmer / Jonathan Gray5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesChol Hyun Park vs Jacob Frueh6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMark Hoskyn / Brandon Richmond vs Michael Tursky / Steve Drake6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesVarun Gampa vs Thai Tran6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLarry Isch / James Willis vs Chad Parks / Brooks Leding6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Marcotte/FS/CM6024615182
2Parks/FS/CM33141638280
3Moore/FS/CM0652552332

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Chol Hyun Park
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.49
Charles Warren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Mark Hoskyn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Dzung Vu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
James Willis
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.39
Robert Remy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.38
Varun Gampa
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Larry Isch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Brandon Richmond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Nathan Marcotte
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Bernie Manard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Shane Irgens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Sam Hanna
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Larry Isch + James Willis314 matchesnot enough data
Brandon Richmond + Mark Hoskyn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chol Hyun Park
45W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.66
3.5
Charles Warren
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Mark Hoskyn
16W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Dzung Vu
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
James Willis
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Robert Remy
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.39
Varun Gampa
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Larry Isch
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Brandon Richmond
5W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.29
Nathan Marcotte
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Bernie Manard
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shane Irgens
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.13
Sam Hanna
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.