Teams

J.Monaghen 4.5 18

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-24vs J.Byrd/B.EcklesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Monaghen / Davis Humphries vs Eric Hilpert / Alex Renfrow3-6, 1-6
2023-05-21vs C.VinsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Monaghen / Jeremy Saunders vs Carlos Garcia-Shelton / Allan Badulis2-6, 1-6
2023-04-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Monaghen vs Garrett Frank0-6, 1-6
2023-04-23vs S.WingoSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMickey Plowden / Jason Liner vs Sean Heuser / Brian Hardwick7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Monaghen vs Rocco Russo6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-21vs M.TreiresLost 02
L#2 SinglesScott Arra vs James Treires0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJason Liner / Adam Thompson vs Jason Coble / Richard McClenny4-6, 4-6
2023-04-16vs P.KellyLost 01
L#2 SinglesScott Arra vs Mike Trefzger1-6, 2-6
2023-03-19vs M.LaddLost 12
W#1 DoublesMickey Plowden / Jason Liner vs Davis Felts / Fred Black6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesScott Arra vs Alberico Menozzi0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJeffrey Monaghen / Adam Thompson vs Kevin Wolborsky / Philippe Adams0-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-03-05vs D.Farmer4.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Liner / Mickey Plowden vs Greg Raschke / Jay White1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Monaghen vs Justin Akonful0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesScott Arra vs Tate Brandt0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.10
Davis Humphries
published 4.5
4.05
Jason Liner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Craig Atkinson
published 4
3.69
Jeffrey Monaghen
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 4
3.68
Jeremy Saunders
published
3.62
Scott Arra
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffrey Monaghen + Jason Liner12363% games+5.3% vs expected
Jason Liner + Scott Arra8360% games+3.3% vs expected
Jeffrey Monaghen + Scott Arra1639% games−8.2% vs expected
Jeremy Saunders + Jeffrey Monaghen033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Davis Humphries
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
4.10
4
Jason Liner
225W–80L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
4.05
4
Craig Atkinson
13W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.86
4
Jeffrey Monaghen
181W–205L career · 12 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Jeremy Saunders
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Scott Arra
35W–76L career · 6 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.