← Teams

WHRC-Webb

2022 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 2.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Stephany Mo
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.21
Pamela Grant
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2021-12-04Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesStephany Mo / Hildie Oliver vs Jing Li / Anh Pham6-4, 6-1
2021-11-14Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesStephany Mo / Hildie Oliver vs Chris van Leeuwen / Patricia Campbell6-4, 6-3
2021-11-07Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesStephany Mo / JaReda Webb vs Susan Robblee / Kim Tellin7-5, 7-5
2021-10-24Won 1–0
W#1 DoublesStephany Mo / Hildie Oliver vs Ellen Bradley / Evelyne Cassell6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2021-10-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesStephany Mo / Hildie Oliver vs Susan Sienko / Anne Mangan6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Thompson / Pamela Grant vs Julie Yang / Barbara Friesen6-2, 7-6
2021-10-09Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesJennie Burlingame / Pamela Grant vs Lisa McConachie / Cyndi Peck6-0, 6-1
2021-09-18Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesStephany Mo / Jennifer Thompson vs Lynda Gordon / Raquel Rich2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-09-12Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesStephany Mo / Pamela Grant vs Ann Clarke / Barbara Friesen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Stephany Mo
54W–49L career
0%98%2%
2.85
2.5
Pamela Grant
35W–45L career
0%95%5%
2.21

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.