Teams

LATA18/Rugg/LCC

2026 Mixed 18 & Over - USTA · 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-08vs LATA18/Kleemoff/LCTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesCory Muncill / Valeri Wilson vs Meg Estes / Jonathan Nilsson6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRyan Baker / Danielle Hilton vs Tiffany Feaster / Anh Salmonson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Taber / Chelsey Ruff vs Denise Holmes / Ken Holmes7-5, 6-1
2026-07-06vs LATA18/Geib/CAMPWon 30
W#1 DoublesCory Muncill / Danielle Hilton vs Libby Hagins / Brannon Hagins7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLane Small / Chelsey Ruff vs Jeff Howle / Lisette Geib6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDargan Gore / Valeri Wilson vs April Holt / Eric Holt7-5, 7-6
2026-06-17vs LATA 3.5M 18 & Over (Price)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesChelsey Ruff / Alex Taber vs Lauren Robertson / Kyle Olenchuk7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Rugg / Erin Groves vs Morgan Sweeney / Trevor Olenchuk7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBen Secoy / Traci Suber vs Molly Price / Vishal Gupta5-7, 4-6
2026-06-10vs LATA18/Burton/LCTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesChelsey Ruff / Garrett Prochaska vs Amber Keough / Andrew Keough0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDanielle Hilton / Ryan Baker vs Addie Dooley / Chris Moody7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesValeri Wilson / Cory Muncill vs Kaliska Vazquez / Daniel Rudzinski6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-03vs LATA18/Kleemoff/LCTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDargan Gore / Erin Groves vs Chris Stader / Corrina Kleemoff6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDanielle Hilton / Lane Small vs Duke Taylor / Meg Estes6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMark Rugg / Valeri Wilson vs Jonathan Nilsson / Megan Peeples6-3, 7-5
2026-06-01vs LATA18/Geib/CAMPWon 30
W#1 DoublesLane Small / Danielle Hilton vs Lisette Geib / Eric Holt6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMark Rugg / Valeri Wilson vs Annagrace Jeffcoat / Jacob Taylor6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAlex Taber / Erin Groves vs Libby Hagins / Brannon Hagins4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-13vs LATA 3.5M 18 & Over (Price)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCory Muncill / Danielle Hilton vs Becky Piper / Kyle Olenchuk6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLane Small / Chelsey Ruff vs Kate Flintom / Lawson Davis5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMark Rugg / Valeri Wilson vs Susan Mathews / Barry Mathews6-3, 7-5
2026-05-06vs LATA18/Burton/LCTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Rugg / Valeri Wilson vs Maira Trimble / Andrew Keough6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDanielle Hilton / Alex Taber vs Filipe Cupertino / Helen Cupertino6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDargan Gore / Traci Suber vs JJ Burton / Christopher Leigh3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Adult Mixed Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LATA 3.5M 18 & Over (Price)7119514166
2LATA18/Rugg/LCC5316819211
3LATA18/Geib/CAMP4491532241
4LATA18/Kleemoff/LCTC3581634249
5LATA18/Burton/LCTC1781635255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Lane Small
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Mark Rugg
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.56
Alex Taber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Dargan Gore
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.41
Garrett Prochaska
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Erin Groves
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Danielle Hilton
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.37
Cory Muncill
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Chelsey Ruff
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.29
Ben Secoy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Traci Suber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Valeri Wilson
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Hilton + Lane Small404 matchesnot enough data
Valeri Wilson + Mark Rugg404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lane Small
83W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.76
Mark Rugg
38W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Alex Taber
71W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Dargan Gore
58W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
Garrett Prochaska
25W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
Erin Groves
73W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Danielle Hilton
52W–33L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Cory Muncill
19W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Chelsey Ruff
29W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Ben Secoy
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Traci Suber
45W–32L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Valeri Wilson
34W–27L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%61%38%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.