Teams

SS-H GREEN

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-17vs SS-H TEALLost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Denise Belk vs David Hand / Dorothy Ripka3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRandy Mancherian / Annika Weeber vs Paige Burke / Paul Whipple3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesYana Ruegsegger / Lee Sport vs Daniel Conroy / Deoni Levy6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-10vs PCC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesRandy Mancherian / Annika Weeber vs Megan Abeyta / Jim Carpenter6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDenise Belk / Connor Ohlsen vs Greg Connelly / Jill Hanafee6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Weis / Wade Schutte vs Shannon Doyle / Greg Arend6-3, 6-4
2026-05-03vs LTFC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesCody Curtis / Annika Weeber vs James Jaggers / Lindsi Darnell6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesYana Ruegsegger / Lee Sport vs Louis Engleberg / Monica Guarin6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJessica Ouwerkerk / Joshua Simmons vs Diem Phan-Boyer / Peter Hanley6-1, 6-3
2026-04-26vs SS-LGT REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesDenise Belk / Joshua Simmons vs Nam Luu / Kara Gerczynski6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesYana Ruegsegger / Stephen Rozman vs Mindy Tabakin / Zachary Horn6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Wharton / Mariana Hosomi vs Rachel Frisz / Carson Rardin5-7, 6-0, 0-1
2026-04-19vs GAC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnnika Weeber / Cody Curtis vs Ryan Beckstrom / Maeve Kearney4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Belk / Randy Mancherian vs Emily Cease / Daniel Green4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesConnor Ohlsen / Mariana Hosomi vs Chris Cremer / Sydnee Yap6-1, 6-2
2026-04-12vs SS-H TEALLost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Hoeltgen / Jessica Ouwerkerk vs Daniel Conroy / Mikaela Potter6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCody Curtis / Mariana Hosomi vs Jordan Jacob / Paige Burke6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesWade Schutte / Deborah Weis vs Amy Hand / David Hand3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-04-05vs PCC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesCody Curtis / Annika Weeber vs Midi Daddis / Tom Kelly6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesConnor Ohlsen / Jessica Ouwerkerk vs Peter Friesen / Jill Hanafee6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMariana Hosomi / John Wharton vs Macey Daddis / Greg Connelly6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.20
Yana Ruegsegger
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.71
Jessica Ouwerkerk
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.55
Mariana Hosomi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.50
Connor Ohlsen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.44
Deborah Weis
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.44
Randy Mancherian
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.43
Craig Hoeltgen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.41
Annika Weeber
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.41
Joshua Simmons
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.35
Amanda Wootton
published 4.5
4.33
Cody Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.22
Denise Belk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
John Wharton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.03
Lee Sport
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Stephen Rozman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Melissa Doidge
published
Wade Schutte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Wharton + Denise Belk213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Yana Ruegsegger
54W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
5.20
Jessica Ouwerkerk
19W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.71
4.5
Mariana Hosomi
24W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.55
4.5
Connor Ohlsen
66W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.50
4.5
Deborah Weis
24W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
4.44
4.5
Randy Mancherian
62W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
4.5
Craig Hoeltgen
29W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
4.43
4.5
Annika Weeber
7W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
4.41
Joshua Simmons
23W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
4.41
4.5
Amanda Wootton
89W–57L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Cody Curtis
16W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
4.5
Denise Belk
130W–87L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
John Wharton
20W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Lee Sport
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
4.03
4
Stephen Rozman
16W–13L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Melissa Doidge
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Wade Schutte
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.