Teams

St.Luther40A

2024 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-09vs Ja.Britt40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesSherrie Lefere / Kara Rectenwald vs Jane Britt / Barbara Timinskas2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-04-30vs Me.Howard40ASplit 11
L#1 DoublesDana Rawls / Dana Chapman vs Anna Koltchagova / Lisa Buyaki3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSherrie Lefere / Kara Rectenwald vs Suzanne Trexler / Gabrielle Shields6-2, 6-2
2024-04-23vs Lo.Hatlen40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesDana Rawls / Molly Briggs vs Zana Piric / Sheila Riley7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSherrie Lefere / Kara Rectenwald vs Dara Haney / Erin McAllister6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDana Chapman / Christi Bowser vs Stacey Jacobs / Kelly Sutton7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-04-16vs Ki.Patrey40ALost 12
L#1 DoublesKaren Ice / Molly Briggs vs Nancy Pack / Laura McNiven2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesFran Ange / Julia Killian vs Meghan Rider / Kristen Fuller2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKara Rectenwald / Sherrie Lefere vs Natalie Regan / Terry Perrone3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-02vs Ja.Britt40ASplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulia Killian / Dana Chapman vs Holly Moore / Sandra Rhoades7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMindy Ladd / Dana Rawls vs Cindy Rosplock / Marcia Fort3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-19vs Me.Howard40AWon 21
W#1 DoublesMolly Briggs / Fran Ange vs Nicole Bullock / Angela Teasdale6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSherrie Lefere / Karen Ice vs Sandra Chapman-Wilson / Liz Broadway3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristi Bowser / Dana Chapman vs Joan Faulkner / Lisa Buyaki6-4, 6-3
2024-03-12vs Lo.Hatlen40AWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaren Ice / Molly Briggs vs Zana Piric / Erin McAllister1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFran Ange / Julia Killian vs Janelle Howard / Sheila Riley5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDana Chapman / Kara Rectenwald vs Janet Sprague / Theresa Stone4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-03-05vs Ki.Patrey40AWon 20
W#1 DoublesDana Rawls / Molly Briggs vs Jane Williams / Carolyn Lee7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFran Ange / Julia Killian vs Natalie Regan / Julie Raftery6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Molly Briggs
published
3.87
Kara Rectenwald
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.68
Annette Page
published 4
3.61
Karen Ice
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Dana Rawls
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.41
Sherrie Lefere
published
3.32
Dana Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.30
Julia Killian
published
3.28
Fran Ange
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Korri Styers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherrie Lefere + Kara Rectenwald2349% games−5.5% vs expected
Karen Ice + Dana Rawls5653% gamesnot enough data
Annette Page + Molly Briggs404 matchesnot enough data
Molly Briggs + Dana Rawls303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Briggs
32W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Kara Rectenwald
72W–31L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
4
Annette Page
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Karen Ice
101W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.61
4
Dana Rawls
129W–110L career · 4 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Sherrie Lefere
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Dana Chapman
56W–66L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Julia Killian
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Fran Ange
74W–100L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Korri Styers
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.