Teams

Avalon-Voeks/Pearsall

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.69 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-13vs Westwood-HauseLost 13
L#1 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Michele Smith vs Barbara Hassett / Bobbie Lou Oley6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Jones / Deirdre Vaughan vs Dana Johnson / Michelle Baker1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHaidee Cline vs Erin O'Shea2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Devalk / Michele Riedel vs Kristy Seredni / Amy Mulholland4-6, 4-6
2024-06-11vs Woodlake-RitterLost 02
L#1 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Marcy Kozlowski1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Beth Jones vs Denise Giaccone / Cindy Birnbaum3-6, 5-7
2024-06-04vs Kanawha-GereckeWon 21
W#1 DoublesLila LaCroix / Emily Gravitt vs Lauren Hauk / Sarah Dickinson7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHaidee Cline vs Melissa Rhoades2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAlice Ulrichs / Beth Jones vs Sara Winterhoff / Lauren Turner6-3, 6-2
2024-05-30vs Hermitage- WilliamsLost 02
L#1 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Michele Smith vs Addie Miller / Mary Williams3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesHaidee Cline vs Jane Kauder3-6, 4-6
2024-05-28vs ACAC- SchuetzingerLost 01
L#2 DoublesHaidee Cline / Meghan Pearsall vs Angela Miller / Alcira Varela de Guzman5-7, 3-6
2024-05-23vs MTC-MeyerLost 03
L#1 DoublesLila LaCroix / Meghan Pearsall vs Olena Turner / Elizabeth Diller4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesHaidee Cline vs Megan Harwood2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMichele Riedel / Karen Devalk vs Darlene Moehling / Tia Thomas1-6, 4-6
2024-05-21vs CCV-DeLaceyLost 03
L#1 DoublesNancy Mihalko / Michele Smith vs Lorraine Hackney / Caroline Harding7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichele Riedel / Alice Ulrichs vs Laurel Wise / Mary Bartzen3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesHaidee Cline vs Kerry DeLacey0-6, 4-6
2024-05-16vs Willow Oaks-StallsLost 13
W#1 DoublesLila LaCroix / Emily Gravitt vs Anne Elles / Kelly Stalls6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHaidee Cline vs Jennifer Smith0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesDeirdre Vaughan vs Natalie Dunton2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMichele Riedel / Nancy Mihalko vs Laurie Schaaf / Sharan Wilder4-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Emily Gravitt
published 4
3.58
LaVera Williams
published
3.53
Lila LaCroix
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.52
Holly Graham
published 4
3.43
Karen Devalk
published
3.40
Haidee Cline
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.40
Michele Riedel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
Meghan Pearsall
published
3.37
Nancy Mihalko
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Deirdre Vaughan
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 22% · published 3.5
3.26
Alice Ulrichs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Judiann Drash
published
Lisa Voeks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Mihalko + Alice Ulrichs303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Gravitt
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
3.88
LaVera Williams
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Lila LaCroix
70W–101L career · 10 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Holly Graham
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
Karen Devalk
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Haidee Cline
91W–91L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Michele Riedel
71W–114L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.40
Meghan Pearsall
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
3.5
Nancy Mihalko
182W–109L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Deirdre Vaughan
162W–178L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Alice Ulrichs
86W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Judiann Drash
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Voeks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.