Teams

3 Willow Oaks Boyle/Mathews

2024 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekend Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.62 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekend Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Barbour
published 4
3.43
James Rosenstock
published
3.38
Greg Loomis
published
3.35
Terence Blackwood
published
3.33
David Aschheim
published 3.5
3.33
Roland Vetter
published
3.32
Philip Strunk
published
3.31
Scott Boyle
published
3.29
Mark Simonton
published
3.27
Stephen Mathews
published
3.25
Keyur Shah
published
3.24
Jeff Moehling
published
3.19
Ryan Frei
published
3.18
John Port
published
3.14
Bernly Bressler
published 3.5
3.12
Brian Ford
published 3.5
2.66
Jonathan Stalls
published
Tim Socia
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Boyle + Stephen Mathews4255% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Barbour
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
James Rosenstock
24W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.43
Greg Loomis
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
Terence Blackwood
22W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
David Aschheim
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
Roland Vetter
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Philip Strunk
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.32
Scott Boyle
18W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Mark Simonton
8W–14L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Stephen Mathews
25W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Keyur Shah
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.25
Jeff Moehling
15W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Ryan Frei
20W–20L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
John Port
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Bernly Bressler
14W–18L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Brian Ford
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Jonathan Stalls
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
Tim Socia
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.