Teams

Ca.Zimmerman55M

2026 Capital Mixed 55 & Over · 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 2.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-05vs Ma.Morriston55MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMark Gentry / Debra Vaughn vs Scott Thurston / Michele Storr2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesEd Stempien / Bethany Stempien vs Marc Morriston / Dawn Morriston6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-07-29vs Jo.Nance55M3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMatt Vaughn / Debra Vaughn vs Dawn Johnstone / Ayden Lee4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBeth Farrell / Bruce Farrell vs Jennifer Silverberg / Ben Hund4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Fuller / Geoff Fuller vs Tom Pullara / Rossi Evans6-7, 0-6
2026-07-22vs Jo.Nance55M3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesChad Smothers / Lee Berrios-Smothers vs Michael Ball / Anne Redmond1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristy Sandy / Steven Sandy vs Melissa Weber / Mark Moye0-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesShannon Fuller / Geoff Fuller vs Joel Nance / Jennifer Silverberg2-6, 2-6
2026-07-15vs Ma.Morriston55MWon 21
L#1 DoublesDebra Vaughn / AP Blake vs Michele Storr / Scott Thurston6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / Chad Smothers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristy Sandy / Steven Sandy vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-24vs Ma.Morriston55MWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatt Vaughn / Debra Vaughn vs Robin Wascher / Scott Thurston6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarol Zimmerman / Mark Gentry vs Perry LeGaux / Elden LeGaux6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBethany Stempien / Ed Stempien vs Dawn Morriston / Marc Morriston0-6, 5-7
2026-06-10vs Jo.Nance55M3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBeth Farrell / Bruce Farrell vs Rossi Evans / Joel Nance7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / Chad Smothers vs Anne Redmond / Ayden Lee6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAP Blake / Carol Zimmerman vs Phillip Wise / Cheri Kivisto3-6, 6-7
2026-06-03vs Ma.Morriston55MWon 21
W#1 DoublesBeth Farrell / Bruce Farrell vs Sabrina Kane / Marc Morriston6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBethany Stempien / Ed Stempien vs Robin Wascher / Daniel Wascher4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristy Sandy / Steven Sandy vs Cecilia Edgar / Juan Leon6-4, 6-1
2026-05-20vs Jo.Nance55M3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMatt Vaughn / Debra Vaughn vs Dawn Johnstone / Joel Nance6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristy Sandy / Mark Gentry vs Mark Moye / Melissa Weber6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesGeoff Fuller / Shannon Fuller vs Tom Pullara / Anne Redmond3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Jo.Nance55M3.08019514181
2Ca.Zimmerman55M3581633222
3Ma.Morriston55M1781636257

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Lee Berrios-Smothers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Christy Sandy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.85
Matt Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Mark Gentry
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Beth Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Bruce Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Ed Stempien
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
AP Blake
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Carol Zimmerman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Debra Vaughn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Geoff Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.22
Chad Smothers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.16
Bethany Stempien
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Steven Sandy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Farrell + Bruce Farrell5254% games+10.7% vs expected
Bethany Stempien + Ed Stempien1835% games+2.1% vs expected
Lee Berrios-Smothers + Chad Smothers033 matchesnot enough data
Debra Vaughn + Matt Vaughn213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lee Berrios-Smothers
78W–107L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Christy Sandy
42W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Matt Vaughn
71W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
Mark Gentry
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Beth Farrell
14W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Bruce Farrell
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Ed Stempien
32W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
AP Blake
31W–84L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Carol Zimmerman
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
3
Debra Vaughn
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Geoff Fuller
21W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
2.63
2.5
Chad Smothers
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Bethany Stempien
77W–106L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
Steven Sandy
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.