Teams

Bogan/18/3.5/WD/BRCC

2025 BR Adult 18 & Over - Women Day · 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-16vs Howard/18/3.5/WD/BRECWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Wester / Brandi Faulk vs Kerri Howard / Lisa Bordelon6-0, 7-6
2025-03-26vs Williams/18/3.5/WD/BRCCWon 10
W#4 DoublesPatty Newton / Nicole Wester vs Katie Williams / Emily Parks6-2, 6-0
2025-03-14vs Curry/18/3.5/WD/LEGWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Wester / Brandi Faulk vs Megan Trahant / Patti Carter6-0, 6-3
2025-03-12vs Hebert/18/3.5/WD/BOCWon 10
W#2 DoublesNicole Wester / Brandi Faulk vs Angela Montalbano / Anna Kronenberger6-1, 6-1
2025-02-26vs LaNasa/18/3.5/WD/CCLAWon 10
W#3 DoublesNicole Wester / Brandi Faulk vs Rondi Cowart / Jessica Johnson6-1, 6-1
2025-02-12vs SELLERS/18/3.5/WD/CCLLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrandi Faulk / Nicole Wester vs Leslie Houser / Cheryl Moreaux5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 BR (18&O) Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Mary Barham
published
3.75
Drew Reilly
published
3.63
Rebecca Harrod
published
3.45
Fran Kelly
published
3.38
Patty Newton
published
3.37
Nicole Wester
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.33
Brandi Faulk
published 3.5
3.32
Katie Ringswald
published
3.29
Michelle Quinn
published
3.17
Tara Weinstein
published
3.11
Katherine Inzer
published
3.11
Lynne Himmel
published
3.10
Leslie Kilpatrick
published
2.98
Tammy Bogan
published
2.75
Renee Skinner
published
Jean Couvillion
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Newton + Brandi Faulk224 matchesnot enough data
Lynne Himmel + Katherine Inzer123 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Harrod + Mary Barham303 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Quinn + Tammy Bogan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Barham
21W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Drew Reilly
18W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.75
Rebecca Harrod
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Fran Kelly
61W–48L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Patty Newton
19W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Nicole Wester
25W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Brandi Faulk
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Katie Ringswald
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Michelle Quinn
7W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Tara Weinstein
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Katherine Inzer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Lynne Himmel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Leslie Kilpatrick
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Tammy Bogan
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Renee Skinner
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Jean Couvillion
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.