Teams

Dominion Grinches

Fire & Ice 2025 - NA · Fire & Ice 3.0 Division

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-07vs ComadrAce Fire and IceWon 21
L#1 DoublesKarla Soto / Carmen Ahmed vs Amanda Alexander / Amanda Barto5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesBlanca Nelly Rosales / Satchie Seidlits vs Ioana Tietzsch / Pamela Vinals6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Echeverri / Elena Camargo vs Andrea Gallegos / Gabriela Tawil6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-12-06vs Slay BellesWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarmen Ahmed / Karla Soto vs Natalie Samson / Chelsea Mills7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBlanca Nelly Rosales / Satchie Seidlits vs Lauren Johnson / Johanna Suttle6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElena Camargo / Alex Echeverri vs Monica Slaydon / Kelly McAlear7-5, 6-3
2025-12-05vs Sleigh All DayWon 30
W#1 DoublesSatchie Seidlits / Blanca Nelly Rosales vs Jennifer Adams / Jackie Kemp6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKarla Soto / Rana Obayes vs Melanie Hanssen / Elaine Taylor6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDiana Correa / Yvette Norling vs Stacy Gallo / Danna Halff6-1, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fire & Ice 3.0 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Blanca Nelly Rosales
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Satchie Seidlits
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.22
Carmen Ahmed
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.20
Jeanette Benavides
published
3.01
Alex Echeverri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Rana Obayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Yvette Norling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Elena Camargo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Diana Correa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Patricia Pedraza
published
Nancy Taft
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Satchie Seidlits + Alex Echeverri7457% games+13.8% vs expected
Blanca Nelly Rosales + Satchie Seidlits6069% games+11.7% vs expected
Patricia Pedraza + Alex Echeverri8165% games+8.4% vs expected
Carmen Ahmed + Blanca Nelly Rosales5067% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Ahmed + Alex Echeverri404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Blanca Nelly Rosales
43W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Satchie Seidlits
44W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
3
Carmen Ahmed
58W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
Jeanette Benavides
8W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Alex Echeverri
66W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
Rana Obayes
26W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Yvette Norling
20W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Elena Camargo
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Diana Correa
1W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Patricia Pedraza
38W–25L career · no lines in 2025
0%11%89%
2.67
Nancy Taft
11W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.