Teams

Florida/Cabane/40&Over4.5M

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 40 & Over - Spring Day · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.70 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-29vs Hackney (Salvadore Park)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAntonio Necuze / Pedro Pozzobon vs Andrew Hellinger / Manuel Gil-Goodman5-7, 4-6
2023-04-23vs GONZALEZ NUNEZ (Royal Palm)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJose Zea / Sebastian MartinezChristensen vs Ralph Martins / Mitchell Stoller6-3, 6-2
2023-04-08vs Davidson (Biltmore)Won 10
W#1 DoublesPedro Pozzobon / Marcos Lopez vs Sebastian Abdelnur / GABRIELE GHINI6-2, 7-6
2023-03-04vs Hackney (Salvadore Park)Split 11
W#2 DoublesRandolph Seivane / Pedro Pozzobon vs Jorge Ramirez / Isidro Gomez6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAlejandro Lataczewski / Jose Zea vs Alex Barrellier / Damian Pilewski4-6, 4-6
2023-02-25vs GONZALEZ NUNEZ (Royal Palm)Won 10
W#2 DoublesPablo Gimenez / Jose Zea vs Rodrigo Arrangoiz / Ralph Martins6-3, 7-6
2023-02-18vs Rapaport (Alper JCC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesPedro Pozzobon vs Felipe Torres5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2023-01-28vs Davidson (Biltmore)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMarcos Lopez / Pedro Pozzobon vs Sebastian Abdelnur / Miguel Fundora6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.23 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Pablo Gimenez
published
4.35
SEBASTIAN COVOS
published
4.31
Antonio Necuze
published 5
4.27
Marcos Lopez
published
4.26
G Emerson Fales
published 4.5
4.15
Luciano Cuneo
published
4.12
4.09
Jose Zea
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Pedro Pozzobon
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SEBASTIAN COVOS + Alejandro Lataczewski6357% games+4.9% vs expected
Sebastian MartinezChristensen + Antonio Necuze0714% games−18.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pablo Gimenez
16W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
4.36
SEBASTIAN COVOS
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
4.35
5
Antonio Necuze
1W–12L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
4.31
Marcos Lopez
16W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
G Emerson Fales
14W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
5
Carlos Manuel Parra-Alvarez
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
4.22
Sebastian MartinezChristensen
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
99%1%<1%
4.20
Luciano Cuneo
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Alejandro Lataczewski
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Jose Zea
58W–43L career · 3 lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
4.09
Pedro Pozzobon
58W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.