← Teams

THPRD-Kim/Bang

2022 Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed

6 players · average NTRP 3.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Chinwoo Kim
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Jihoon Bang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Mihee Park
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.11
Mihye Ko
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.94
Misug Kim
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.90
Jinmi Kemple
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Results13 ties
2022-10-02Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMihye Ko / JIN PARK vs Nicola Ash / Nick Hooker6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMisug Kim / Daniel M Kim vs Jane Paulsen / Christian Paulsen7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-01Split 1–1
L#2 DoublesMihye Ko / Chinwoo Kim vs Steven Ehrlich / Ursula Heenan6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMisug Kim / Daniel M Kim vs Carlos Apacible / Dawn Apacible4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-09-30Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesMihye Ko / Chinwoo Kim vs Kristi Dawson / Chad Dawson6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-30Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMisug Kim / Daniel M Kim vs Ibolya Stark / Blake Stockstad4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMihye Ko / JIN PARK vs Chris Coovert / Kristin Coovert6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-03-27Split 1–1
W#2 DoublesMihye Ko / Jihoon Bang vs Christian Paulsen / Jane Paulsen6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMisug Kim / Daniel M Kim vs Nicola Ash / Nick Hooker6-1, 6-4
2022-03-26Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesMisug Kim / Daniel M Kim vs Robert Truong / Janet Ha6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-31Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMisug Kim / Daniel M Kim vs Karen Pickering / Tyler Grant7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Jihoon Bang vs Patricia Nierenberg / Abhisar Gupta6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMihee Park / JIN PARK vs Becky Nelson / Mark Bernazzani1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-10-24Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMihee Park / JIN PARK vs Rebecca Griffith / Gabriel Barroso Mendoza6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Jihoon Bang vs Samanta Rodriguez Silva / Scott Learn6-0, 6-1
2021-10-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesMihye Ko / Chinwoo Kim vs Lucila Griesser / Robert Gettle6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMihee Park / JIN PARK vs Cricket Forsey / Jeff Welter7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMisug Kim / Daniel M Kim vs Robin Welter / James North6-3, 6-0
2021-10-03Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesMihye Ko / Chinwoo Kim vs Hoon Shin / Kim Tellin6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMihee Park / JIN PARK vs Eddie Shin / Jill Boyce6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesHyekyeong Kim / Jihoon Bang vs Shawn Boyce / Constance Erickson6-4, 6-2
2021-09-26Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJIN PARK / Jinmi Kemple vs Christie Herkert / Paul Best6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMisug Kim / Daniel M Kim vs Meegan Fruits / Paul Preston6-0, 6-2
2021-09-18Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesMihye Ko / Chinwoo Kim vs Jane King Ayers / Eric Ayers6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMisug Kim / Daniel M Kim vs Jennifer Weaver / Dan Blaker6-2, 6-1
2021-09-12Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJinmi Kemple / Jihoon Bang vs Katie Jurgenson / Joshua Husbands6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMihye Ko / Chinwoo Kim vs Barbara Gram / Zachary Wright7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMihee Park / Jason Lee vs Sara Vanderhoff / Scott Vanderhoff6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Chinwoo Kim
90W–54L career
0%86%14%
3.47
3.5
Jihoon Bang
57W–41L career
0%99%1%
3.32
3
Mihee Park
147W–89L career
0%23%77%
3.20
3
Mihye Ko
98W–51L career
0%49%51%
3.11
3
Misug Kim
61W–31L career
0%91%9%
2.94
3
Jinmi Kemple
75W–78L career
0%96%4%
2.90

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.