Teams

Anderson

2026 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-09vs Benowitz: ORCC Net MastersLost 23
L#1 DoublesAndrew Nguyen / Joe Petersen vs Zachary Robins / Alex Roberts1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesTim Gilbert vs Stephen Hoffman2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBilly Oswald / Zachary Johnson vs David Benowitz / Neil Fink6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesFernando Furquim vs Alex Gustafson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTristan Bradford / Austin Choe vs Louie Lafleur / Matt Dahms6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-03-02vs Craig/Lassow - Net Hounds W26Lost 05
L#1 DoublesAndrew Nguyen / Jaykumar Jayswal vs Nick Welch / Richard Lassow6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHugo Westrelin vs Joshua Lerud1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLuke Anderson / John Mercer vs Jeff Craig / Tom Larson4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesNicholas Bata vs Sam McCormick0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLuciano Patino / Anthony Brooks vs Scott Simpson / Arkady Shemyakin1-6, 0-6
2026-02-16vs Jaspers Highly StrungLost 23
L#1 DoublesZachary Johnson / Hugo Westrelin vs Mark Meyer / John Barnes6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAustin Choe vs GAVIN HALLORAN6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesFernando Furquim / Anthony Brooks vs Robert Rincon / Corey Berge7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBilly Oswald vs Johnny Rajan7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLuke Anderson / Tristan Bradford vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-02-02vs Benowitz: ORCC Net MastersLost 14
L#1 DoublesJohn Mercer / Nicholas Bata vs Neil Fink / Taylor Matysik4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAustin Choe vs Stephen Hoffman7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJaykumar Jayswal / Joe Petersen vs Alex Roberts / Alex Gustafson5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesTim Gilbert vs David Benowitz6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesTristan Bradford / Anthony Brooks vs Matt Dahms / Louie Lafleur2-6, 2-6
2026-01-26vs Craig/Lassow - Net Hounds W26Lost 14
W#1 DoublesHugo Westrelin / Zachary Johnson vs Robert MacHalek / Richard Lassow2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBilly Oswald vs Joshua Lerud3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoe Petersen / Luke Anderson vs Jeff Craig / Jack Swain7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesNicholas Bata vs Jordi Martin Cossio1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFernando Furquim / John Mercer vs Michael Streater / Tom Larson2-6, 5-7
2026-01-19vs Sandozi: Minnesota SLICEWon 32
W#1 DoublesAndrew Nguyen / Hugo Westrelin vs David Rickheim / Paul Smyth5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAustin Choe vs Tong Shen4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Jaykumar Jayswal vs Nam Ho / Nick Rush7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBilly Oswald vs Tom Brand6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLuciano Patino / Tristan Bradford vs Robert Kohl / Erik Chomko6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-01-05vs Jaspers Highly StrungWon 32
L#1 DoublesJaykumar Jayswal / Zachary Johnson vs John Barnes / Mark Meyer4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBilly Oswald vs GAVIN HALLORAN3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Nguyen / John Mercer vs Steve Jaspers / Jesse Newton6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAustin Choe vs Johnny Rajan1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Fernando Furquim vs Robert Rincon / Arthur Saldana6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Andrew Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.46
Austin Choe
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Billy Oswald
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Jaykumar Jayswal
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Tim Gilbert
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.01
Fernando Furquim
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Nicholas Bata
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Hugo Westrelin
usually #1 Doubles 91%, also #1 Singles 9% · published
2.95
Tristan Bradford
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Luciano Patino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Joe Petersen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
John Mercer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Nguyen + Jaykumar Jayswal314 matchesnot enough data
Hugo Westrelin + Nicholas Bata134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrew Nguyen
10W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Austin Choe
19W–25L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Billy Oswald
6W–4L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Jaykumar Jayswal
34W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Tim Gilbert
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
Fernando Furquim
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Nicholas Bata
2W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Hugo Westrelin
41W–21L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.98
Tristan Bradford
7W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
2.95
Luciano Patino
4W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Joe Petersen
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
John Mercer
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.