Teams

GAC GREEN

2024 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME

9 players · average NTRP 2.70 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-06-11vs HRCA-N TEALSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKris Stern / Jeni Anderson vs Sara Binge / Michelle Gentry1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLeah Putnam / Amy Anderson vs Caroline Schroback / Rebekah Green6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-04vs CPCC TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeah Putnam / Allison Keefer vs Heather Hagen / Nicki Erdle6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKris Stern / Jeni Anderson vs Brittany Grimm / Jena Gill6-2, 6-0
2024-05-28vs PCC GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesKris Stern / Anne Campbell vs Marti Longo / Dawn D'Amato3-6, 3-6
2024-05-21vs HRCA-N TEALWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Kleimann / Leah Putnam vs Ann Citrin / Michelle Gentry6-4, 7-5
2024-05-07vs PCC GREENLost 02
L#2 DoublesLeah Putnam / Susan Kleimann vs Dawn D'Amato / Erica Haycock3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMary Brauer / Kris Stern vs Renee Dyer / Amy Cook1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.66
Jeni Anderson
published
2.57
Anne Campbell
published 3
2.44
Kris Stern
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.36
Leah Putnam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Allison Keefer
published 2.5
Anna Calicchio
published 2.5
2.14
Gwen Hubbard
published
2.13
Louise Atkinson
published
2.07
Susan Kleimann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Kleimann + Leah Putnam10359% games+11.7% vs expected
Kris Stern + Anne Campbell9255% games+5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeni Anderson
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
2.66
3
Anne Campbell
32W–17L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.57
3
Kris Stern
46W–64L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44
2.5
Leah Putnam
48W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Allison Keefer
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Anna Calicchio
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Gwen Hubbard
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.14
Louise Atkinson
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Susan Kleimann
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.