Teams

EM RED

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs VC PURPLELost 04
L#1 DoublesRyan Matley / Joshua Wolden vs David Bauer / Andy Samaras1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDavid McLain vs Raffaello Sacerdoti4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJOHN INGRAHAM / Drew Kelleher vs Arend Accola / Joe Assini6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMatthew Crouse / Michael Wilson vs Peter Johnson / David Stamatis2-6, 0-6
2026-07-06vs SS-D SILVERLost 04
L#1 DoublesDavid Steimel / David McLain vs Brian Francis / Robert George4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTyler Lindvall vs Scott Lee3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJOHN INGRAHAM / Drew Kelleher vs Colin Dougherty / Ross King3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRyan Matley / Tim Saunders vs Matthew Kuptz / Steve Serenyi2-6, 5-7
2026-06-29vs HG NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJoshua Wolden / David Steimel vs Mark Custer / Bryan Langman5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTim Saunders vs Brandon Aslin0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDrew Kelleher / Tyler Lindvall vs Nick Knudtson / Bradley Scott6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJOHN INGRAHAM / Michael Wilson vs Bill Clifford / Bradley Isroff4-6, 2-6
2026-06-22vs GAC GREENLost 13
L#1 DoublesMatthew Crouse / Joshua Wolden vs Jerry Augustin / Andy Garrobo2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesTim Saunders vs John Adam Killian0-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJOHN INGRAHAM / Ryan Matley vs Michael Patton / Jason Wagner0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCameron Schubert / Drew Kelleher vs Zach Ward / Ray Perry6-4, 6-2
2026-06-17vs SKY GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesDavid Steimel / Joshua Wolden vs Mark Sabatos / Aaron Weiss6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesTyler Lindvall vs Roy Smith6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDrew Kelleher / Matthew Crouse vs Brian Hunter / Andrew Sarka6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Wilson / Tim Saunders vs Dan Almuti / Merle Atkinson6-7, 3-6
2026-06-08vs LTFC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRyan Matley / Joshua Wolden vs Nathan Raper / James DeLurgio7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJOHN INGRAHAM vs Peter Marle0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Steimel / Michael Wilson vs Bruce Bowman / Lael Fray4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCameron Schubert / Tim Saunders vs Stanley Pritchet / Michael Detampel4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-01vs HFII REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesJOHN INGRAHAM / David Steimel vs Andrew Troyer / Brian Hunter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDavid McLain vs Matthew Linnell6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoshua Wolden / Tyler Lindvall vs Brian Perkins / Jessi Andrews4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRyan Matley / Cameron Schubert vs Bradley Cole / John Hiner6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
David Steimel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.73
Drew Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.69
Matthew Crouse
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
David McLain
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.68
Joshua Wolden
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.66
Cameron Schubert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Tim Saunders
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.58
JOHN INGRAHAM
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.54
Ryan Matley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.52
Tyler Lindvall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.51
Matt Arnold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Steimel + JOHN INGRAHAM224 matchesnot enough data
JOHN INGRAHAM + Drew Kelleher224 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Matley + Joshua Wolden213 matchesnot enough data
David Steimel + Matt Arnold033 matchesnot enough data
David Steimel + Joshua Wolden303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Steimel
59W–72L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Drew Kelleher
9W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Matthew Crouse
5W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
3
David McLain
19W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Joshua Wolden
9W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Cameron Schubert
2W–4L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
2.66
Tim Saunders
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65
JOHN INGRAHAM
13W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
27%72%<1%
2.58
Ryan Matley
12W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
Tyler Lindvall
8W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
2.52
Matt Arnold
3W–16L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.