Teams

Broward/Midtown - Guiulfo

2022 Broward Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-15vs Wtc - ToughLove/ThanSplit 11
L#2 DoublesMariana Rodriguez / Ana Milano vs Janice Toh / Michelle Pellow4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesIli Montnor / Yvonne Dillon vs Liliana Carrillo / Lara Than6-2, 7-6
2022-08-19vs Wtc - ToughLove/ThanLost 01
L#1 DoublesLinda Horta / Paula Luna vs Jocelyn Jane / Michelle Pellow3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-08-12vs Wtc - ToughLove/ThanWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Horta / Ana Milano vs Janice Toh / Lara Than6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRaeven Yester / Tatiana Prado vs Martha Lucia Alvarez / Donna Cousins6-0, 6-1
2022-08-05vs Wtc - ToughLove/ThanLost 01
L#3 DoublesRaeven Yester / Paola Olazabal Yervis vs Liliana Carrillo / Michelle Pellow1-6, 3-6
2022-07-29vs Wtc - ToughLove/ThanWon 20
W#1 DoublesIli Montnor / Marcela Cury vs Luisa Ortiz / Diana Navarrete4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Horta / Yvonne Dillon vs Jocelyn Jane / Vanitha Vasudevan7-5, 6-3
2022-07-22vs Wtc - ToughLove/ThanWon 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Horta / Gabriela Reyes vs Jamilet Nunez Dupuy / Lara Than6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Guiulfo / Ana Milano vs Martha Lucia Alvarez / Luisa Ortiz6-2, 6-0
2022-07-15vs Wtc - ToughLove/ThanWon 10
W#2 DoublesIli Montnor / Yvonne Dillon vs Natalia Smyth / Liliana Carrillo6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Linda Horta
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Ili Montnor
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Raeven Yester
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Ana Milano
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Sara Contreras
published
2.43
Paula Luna
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Horta + Raeven Yester18364% games+5.5% vs expected
Ana Milano + Linda Horta314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Linda Horta
103W–63L career · 4 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Ili Montnor
168W–92L career · 3 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Raeven Yester
169W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%33%67%
3.56
3
Ana Milano
90W–85L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
2.87
Sara Contreras
20W–28L career · no lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
Paula Luna
1W–7L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.