Teams

Pretzsch 3.5W 40s Tues PM

2024 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-30vs Manning 3.5W 40s Tues PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesElaine Fox / Carrie Tauber vs Margaret Joseph / Ginger Hayworth2-6, 2-6
2024-04-23vs Messick/Hemric 3.5W 40s Tues PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesElaine Fox / Lisa Cassidy vs Medy Wurth / Donna Blizard5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-04-16vs Williams 3.5W 40s Tues PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesMarian Hogan / Carrie Tauber vs Frida Nordmark / Caroline DeVillers7-5, 7-5
2024-04-02vs Crosier/Shigo 3.5W 40s Tues PMWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarian Hogan / Jennifer Hitchcock vs Patty Craig / Andrea Pollina6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElaine Fox / Nell Pretzsch vs Kirsten Bertschi / Hayes Mills6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-26vs Winstead/Wilson 3.5W 40s Tues PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesElaine Fox / Carrie Tauber vs Lisa Baker / Rosa Phillips2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Marian Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Vangie Cruz
published
3.29
Nell Pretzsch
published
3.21
Elaine Fox
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.18
Carrie Tauber
published 3.5
3.04
Sallie Bett Theall
published
3.03
Sarah Witherspoon
published
3.01
Lisa Cassidy
published
2.85
Whitney Gansman
published
2.84
Alisa Miller
published 3
Jenny Wonders
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nell Pretzsch + Carrie Tauber1435% gamesnot enough data
Sallie Bett Theall + Carrie Tauber213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marian Hogan
128W–54L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.60
Vangie Cruz
20W–19L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Nell Pretzsch
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Elaine Fox
113W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Carrie Tauber
6W–18L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Sallie Bett Theall
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Sarah Witherspoon
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Lisa Cassidy
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Whitney Gansman
8W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Alisa Miller
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
2.84
Jenny Wonders
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.