Teams

Haynes-Bear Pen

2026 Adult 18 & Over-DLT · Women 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-03vs Wooley-DCTRCLost 12
W#1 DoublesCaroline Hill / Emily Melton vs Latoya Sykes / Anne Bailey Jernigan6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHolly Wells / Jordan Langston vs Vickie L Dodd / Arlayna Moss4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Cothren / Shelby Swafford vs Ali Santucci / Heike Wooley6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-12vs Cundiff/Rocconi-CCCWon 32
W#1 DoublesCaroline Hill / Emily Melton vs Taylor Newton / Melissa Castle6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesShelby Swafford vs Haley Chaney6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHolly Wells / Paige Burchfield vs Brooke Cundiff / Britney Rocconi6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesJordan Langston vs Lauren Shurden3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Phillips / Caroline Bond vs Abby Gilbert / Shelby Carter4-6, 1-6
2026-03-29vs Myers/Shannon/Aylward-CCCLost 14
W#1 DoublesCaroline Hill / Emily Melton vs Samantha Myers / Mari Micci Bramuchi1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHolly Wells vs Whitney Morgan4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJordan Langston / Caroline Bond vs Kelsey Spradling / Taylor Ward0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesShelby Swafford vs Teresa Reed5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Burchfield / Claire Cothren vs Kristen Crow / Megan Wicker4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Holly Wells
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Calli Pinkerton
published 3
2.71
Emily Melton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Shelby Swafford
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.68
Caroline Hill
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Jordan Langston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Claire Cothren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Caroline Bond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Paige Burchfield
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Melton + Caroline Hill5254% games−12.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Wells
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Calli Pinkerton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Emily Melton
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Shelby Swafford
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
3
Caroline Hill
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
Jordan Langston
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Claire Cothren
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Caroline Bond
3W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Paige Burchfield
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.