Teams

DWest (Park Road)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM

7 players · average NTRP 4.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-14vs MLewis (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Wilkins / Samantha Danesis vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY / Lela Thompson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-07vs JAlexander/PBeecher (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesSamantha Danesis vs Josie Shuford6-2, 6-3
2022-04-23Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Sopel / Lisa Wilkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiofra Azucenas / Hannah Brown vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-12vs JAlexander/PBeecher (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesSamantha Danesis vs Josie Shuford7-6, 6-0
2022-04-02vs MLewis (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesSamantha Danesis vs MAGDALENA STUDENOVSKY6-4, 6-2
2022-03-26vs JAlexander/PBeecher (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#1 SinglesSamantha Danesis vs Elizabeth Super6-0, 6-0
2022-03-05vs MLewis (Jeff Adams)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSalem Kirven / Samantha Danesis vs Susan Uzarski / Elizabeth Schrand3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana West / Diofra Azucenas vs Stacy Agar / Melanie Lewis4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-26vs JAlexander/PBeecher (Jeff Adams)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSamantha Danesis / Hannah Chillag vs Kim Ezzo / Jennifer Alexander6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 5.0 Women - Sat PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.61
Samantha Danesis
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #1 Singles 31% · published 5
4.41
Hannah Chillag
published 4.5
4.35
Jaclyn Rock
published 4.5
4.29
Diofra Azucenas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Diana West
published 4.5
4.16
Salem Kirven
published
4.15
Jennifer Sopel
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana West + Hannah Chillag134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Samantha Danesis
111W–53L career · 13 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.61
4.5
Hannah Chillag
21W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Jaclyn Rock
51W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
4.35
4.5
Diofra Azucenas
99W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Diana West
34W–22L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
4.28
Salem Kirven
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
Jennifer Sopel
76W–63L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.