Teams

Cleveland/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-05-09vs Flynt/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Corbin / Katie Gobbell vs Marjorie Porter / Amanda Whittington5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesPeyton Corbin vs Francesca Bengert6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMadison Cleveland / Cody Lambert vs Libby Flynt / Lauren Colpitts6-1, 6-0
2026-04-29vs Wright/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesCody Lambert / Christa Smith vs Kelcie Nollner / Julie Upchurch2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesPeyton Corbin vs Alecia Monett7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMadison Cleveland / Lauren Downs vs Alicia Wright / Rachel Spangler2-6, 4-6
2026-04-25vs Justice/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauren Downs / Michelle Corbin vs Andi Long / Lisa Berryhill6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesConnie Clarkson vs Kristin Frazier2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMadison Cleveland / Cody Lambert vs Anna Claire Gleason / Rachel Veteto6-0, 6-4
2026-04-22vs SLewis/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesConnie Clarkson / Peyton Corbin vs Sally Lewis / Allie Olson Battle6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChrista Smith vs Casey Gleysteen3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMorgan Baker / Katie Gobbell vs Marianne Smith / Sydney Gilluly6-1, 6-0
2026-04-15vs Blanton/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesConnie Clarkson / Cody Lambert vs Karen Hamburger / Beverly Kimbrough0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesPeyton Corbin vs Greer Moyes6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMadison Cleveland / Katie Gobbell vs Abigail Cardwell / Emma Dotson4-6, 2-6
2026-04-11vs Ray/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesChrista Smith / Connie Clarkson vs Allison Fowler / Claire Murk4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Corbin vs Morgan Thornton6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Downs / Katie Gobbell vs Lesley Patel / Rachel Crawford6-1, 6-4
2026-04-04vs Biedenharn/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesChrista Smith / Cody Lambert vs Louise Biedenharn / Erin Morrison2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMorgan Baker vs Allison Ann Klawinski6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMadison Cleveland / Lauren Downs vs Shelton Wittenberg / Shibahn Rodda4-6, 2-6
2026-03-28vs Taylor/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesLauren Downs / Michelle Corbin vs Amanda Clayton / Kelsey Handley6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesPeyton Corbin vs La Shara Varnell-Smith6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChrista Smith / Madison Cleveland vs Zoe Harrison / Daniela Wagner6-4, 6-2
2026-03-21vs JLewis/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesConnie Clarkson / Morgan Baker vs Barbara Wilson / Tina David6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesChrista Smith vs Terry Bondurant0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Corbin / Peyton Corbin vs Susan Reyna / Kim Denbow6-0, 6-1
2026-03-07vs Nelson/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Corbin / Connie Clarkson vs Margaret Roney / Allison Palazola6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMorgan Baker vs Amanda Nelson6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLauren Downs / Christa Smith vs Julia McDonald / Joelle Rogin1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.38 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Michelle Corbin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.63
Peyton Corbin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.43
Christa Smith
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.42
Morgan Baker
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Katie Gobbell
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.20
Connie Clarkson
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.16
Madison Cleveland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.15
Cody Lambert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Corbin + Peyton Corbin6080% gamesnot enough data
Madison Cleveland + Christa Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Morgan Baker + Connie Clarkson224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Corbin + Connie Clarkson303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Corbin
29W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.77
Peyton Corbin
18W–2L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%17%83%
2.63
2.5
Christa Smith
13W–15L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Morgan Baker
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Katie Gobbell
9W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Connie Clarkson
10W–16L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20
Madison Cleveland
11W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16
2.5
Cody Lambert
5W–9L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.