Teams

Kirby 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM

2026 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women 55 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesCheryl Scott / Michelle Shoemaker vs Lee Varner / Jennifer M Riley6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Hanson / Karyn Efird vs Lauran Epstein / Kimberley Cathey6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Vary / Sue Ann Lapp vs Emily Wilson / Brandye Peterson6-1, 6-2
2026-08-25vs Ysidron 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Hestenes / Mariann Van Ryen vs Angela Greene / Liz Busch7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRobyn Manning / Sue Ann Lapp vs Deborah Ysidron / Andrea Hayes7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Joseph / Cindy Cooke vs Sandra Simpkins / Susan Shughart6-2, 6-4
2026-08-18vs Pressley 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PmWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaryn Efird / Amy Hanson vs Sandra Hickman Turner / Laura Walters6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Joseph / Angie Messick vs Hayes Mills / Amy Dulin6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesKaryn Efird / Amy Hanson vs Cindy Wood / Kathryn Michaud6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLinda Hestenes / Angie Messick vs Myra Propst / Tammie Hughes2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRobyn Manning / Sue Ann Lapp vs Sue White / Gwen Highsmith-Quick6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesCheryl Scott / Janice Wilkinson vs Veatrice Jones / Lana Baeten6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Hestenes / Mariann Van Ryen vs Margaret Lynde-Rhyne / Janice Gilman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Vary / Michelle Shoemaker vs Lisa Cassidy / Susan Brodeur6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 6.5 Women 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Clancy 55s 6.5W Combo W Fri AM3081450
2Kirby 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM2051344
3Collins 55s 6.5 Combo W Fri AM2154870
4Berreth/Herron 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM2163966
5Pressley 55s 6.5W Combo Tues Pm1030224
6White/Redding 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM1142648
7Chapman/Partagas 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM12451081
8MacFadden 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM12451288
9Billings/Wilson 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM000000
10Shivaji 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM0103631
11Rhyne/Gorham 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM0103635
12Ysidron 55s 6.5W Combo Tues PM0103636
13Wolff 55s 6.5W Combo Fri AM030918106

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Karyn Efird
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.32
Linda Hestenes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Laura Vary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Cindy Cooke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.29
Margaret Joseph
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Trisha Kirby
published
3.25
Robyn Manning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Sue Ann Lapp
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Michelle Shoemaker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.93
Angie Messick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.89
Janice Wilkinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Mariann Van Ryen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ginger Hayworth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Manning + Margaret Joseph5259% games+4.5% vs expected
Angie Messick + Mariann Van Ryen201555% games−9.7% vs expected
Angie Messick + Cindy Cooke4169% gamesnot enough data
Ginger Hayworth + Karyn Efird303 matchesnot enough data
Karyn Efird + Angie Messick213 matchesnot enough data
Mariann Van Ryen + Robyn Manning123 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Cooke + Margaret Joseph213 matchesnot enough data
Janice Wilkinson + Sue Ann Lapp303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karyn Efird
256W–113L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
Linda Hestenes
21W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Laura Vary
23W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3
Cindy Cooke
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
Margaret Joseph
16W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
2%91%7%
3.29
Trisha Kirby
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Robyn Manning
139W–69L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Sue Ann Lapp
19W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
Michelle Shoemaker
12W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Angie Messick
103W–78L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
2.93
Janice Wilkinson
11W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Mariann Van Ryen
121W–99L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Ginger Hayworth
88W–42L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.