Teams

Wilson - RS Hard

2025 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-24vs Escambia/Ross/40&Over3.0WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMegan Frederick / Kacee Bidnick vs Trish Kington / Susan Rice6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLauren Burch vs Cheryl Vann3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJill Wilson / Leigh Diamond vs Nancy Way / Lori Orslene6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichelle Patterson / Janice Clark vs Kathy Ross / Malu Dunn1-6, 2-6
2025-03-27vs Escambia/Ross/40&Over3.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle Patterson / Lauren Burch vs Susan Rice / Cheryl Vann1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesStacy Wilks / Megan Frederick vs Kadi Taylor / Natalia Burroughs6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRegina Dixon / Jill Wilson vs Kathy Ross / India Scott7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-20vs Maclean - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesTonya Chase / Liz Payne vs Christina Amjad / Liz Edlund7-5, 6-4
2025-03-13vs Etscheid - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesLiz Payne / Tonya Chase vs Sissy Ford / Kimberly Etscheid6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Lauren Burch
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Liz Payne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Stacy Wilks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Jill Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Tonya Chase
published
2.77
Leigh Diamond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Kacee Bidnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alita Fisher
published 3
2.66
Regina Dixon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Janice Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Patterson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Burch
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Liz Payne
139W–105L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Stacy Wilks
17W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Jill Wilson
9W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.88
Tonya Chase
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Leigh Diamond
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Kacee Bidnick
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Alita Fisher
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Regina Dixon
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.66
Janice Clark
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Patterson
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.