Teams

Lakeside Advantage - Howell

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-08vs CCV Murphy ParkerWon 10
W#2 DoublesJeff Richman / Sam McKelvey vs John Reifsnider / John Reifsnider Jr7-6, 6-4
2025-06-07vs Westwood Heavy Hitters - LeftwichLost 01
L#2 DoublesJean-Luc Holzem / Sam McKelvey vs Wes Valentine / Mike Whitaker4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-06-01vs Hermitage - Sadusky 4.0 WeekendWon 10
W#2 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Sam McKelvey vs Daniel Sadusky / Kelby Morgan7-6, 7-6
2025-05-04vs 4.0 TDC Orioles-ShermanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJean-Luc Holzem / Sam McKelvey vs Joe Basil / Timothy Sherman6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAndy Tucker / Edward Yesbeck vs Jiyya Rao Kondeti / Prabir Purohit4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesSam McKelvey / Jay Abbud vs Michael Anderson / Thomas Webb6-3, 6-0
2025-04-13vs Westwood Ladybugs - CecilLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Jeff Richman vs Charles Wayland / Greg Robinson2-6, 3-6
2025-04-06vs ACAC HellerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJean-Luc Holzem / Sam McKelvey vs Cliff Heller / William Crowe4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJeff Richman / Edward Yesbeck vs Jesse Smith / Josh Cohen6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Sam McKelvey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Andy Tucker
published 4
3.74
Eric Ludwig
published 4
3.73
Dwight Ludwig
published 4
3.68
Matthew Earle
published
3.67
Jean-Luc Holzem
published
3.64
Edward Yesbeck
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Jay Abbud
published
3.62
Michael Hazelwood
published
3.60
William Cosby
published
3.56
Alton Howell
published 4
3.37
Vernon Heishman
published
3.33
Jeff Richman
published
Ryan Pelais
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sam McKelvey
158W–91L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Andy Tucker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Eric Ludwig
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Dwight Ludwig
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Matthew Earle
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.68
Jean-Luc Holzem
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Edward Yesbeck
127W–115L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Jay Abbud
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
William Cosby
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Alton Howell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Vernon Heishman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jeff Richman
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.33
Ryan Pelais
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.