Teams

Li.Arcos18M

2025 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-08-05vs Ki.Durland18M4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesMicah Widen / Jenna Raynor vs Alex van Staveren / Darin Meyer7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRosalyn Hatlen / Jason Widen vs Alicia Dare / David Dare1-6, 1-6
2025-08-04vs Jo.VanCampen18MWon 10
W#1 DoublesHannon Thorn / Micah Widen vs Winston Henderson / See Boon Soo6-4, 6-4
2025-07-30vs Ra.Xu18MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMicah Widen / Hannah Boghosian vs Nikki DAmbrose / Matthew Glenn7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJason Widen / Rosalyn Hatlen vs Pamela Hankerson / Gabriel Iocco5-7, 2-6
2025-07-21vs Le.Ji18MLost 02
L#1 DoublesMicah Widen / Hannon Thorn vs Joshua Ganeles / Angela Teasdale1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLiz Arcos / Jeffrey Pollack vs Miles Feng / Kelsey Kowalski0-6, 0-6
2025-07-19vs Ja.Liner18MLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Pollack / Hannon Thorn vs Scott Arra / Erica Jackson3-6, 4-6
2025-07-14vs Jo.Whalen18MLost 02
L#1 DoublesHannon Thorn / John Hardin vs Meryl Golder / Istvan Pataki6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHannah Boghosian / Micah Widen vs Elena Pinkus / Craig Schauman6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2025-06-30vs Sk.Poole18MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesHannon Thorn / John Taylor vs Laura Capps / Greg Capps6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMicah Widen / Rosalyn Hatlen vs Anne Bailey / Patrick Bailey3-6, 5-7
2025-06-16vs To.Sutler18MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJenna Raynor / Micah Widen vs Tori Sutler / Cody Sutler7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-06-02vs Sp.Johnson18MLost 01
L#2 DoublesJohn Hardin / Hannon Thorn vs McKinsey Blount / Andrew Pham1-6, 0-6
2025-05-19vs Sh.Baggett18MWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohn Hardin / Hannon Thorn vs Joanna Brooks / Joe Neylan6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLuis Arcos / Liz Arcos vs Morgan Camp / Jackie Caprio6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Pollack / Rosalyn Hatlen vs Adam Dailey / Kristi Koren3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Hannon Thorn
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.81
Jenna Raynor
published
3.80
Hannah Boghosian
published 4
3.54
Micah Widen
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.34
Rosalyn Hatlen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Jeffrey Pollack
published
3.31
Liz Arcos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Jason Widen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hannon Thorn
75W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Jenna Raynor
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Hannah Boghosian
22W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Micah Widen
49W–64L career · 7 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Rosalyn Hatlen
8W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Jeffrey Pollack
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
3.32
3.5
Liz Arcos
193W–124L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Jason Widen
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.