Teams

CAS.Hayes

2025 CTRL Summer Singles 40 & Over · Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-04vs TING.WhiteLost 03
L#1 SinglesJessica Patrick vs Sarah London1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJulie Artieri vs Renata Yakobov3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesHeather DeAngelis vs Claudia Bownes4-6, 1-6
2025-07-31vs MD.WeberWon 20
W#1 SinglesErika Clausson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesStayce Key vs Sheridan Orr6-0, 6-0
2025-07-24vs TOC.GrasserSplit 11
L#1 SinglesStayce Key vs Diane Volkmar6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesErika Clausson vs Kristen Henderson6-1, 7-6
2025-07-17vs TOC.LeahySplit 11
W#1 SinglesErika Clausson vs Lisa Goodman6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKristin Baldyga vs Heather Ingram0-6, 2-6
2025-07-14vs ACP.MurphyWon 10
W#1 SinglesErika Clausson vs Lea Ann Baker6-2, 6-1
2025-06-19vs KF.ScagnelliSplit 11
W#2 SinglesErika Clausson vs Jennifer Hellrung6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesChrista Resavy vs Jocelyn Quick5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Summer Singles 40 & Over 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Erika Clausson
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Stayce Key
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Jeannette Walker
published
2.96
Christa Resavy
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.73
Diane Hayes
published 3
2.66
Kristin Baldyga
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.63
Heather DeAngelis
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.34
Julie Artieri
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Jessica Patrick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Baldyga + Christa Resavy71050% games+10.3% vs expected
Stayce Key + Erika Clausson2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erika Clausson
65W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Stayce Key
159W–140L career · 2 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Jeannette Walker
29W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Christa Resavy
72W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Diane Hayes
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Kristin Baldyga
45W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Heather DeAngelis
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Julie Artieri
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Jessica Patrick
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.