Teams

Waide/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-03vs Brill-Shuman/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Huinker / Alaina Smith vs Annabel Sims / Betsy Wood2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesRebecca Bender vs Natalia Ward6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLeAnn Waide / Jamie Iverson vs Annette Thompson / Catherine Shuman2-6, 4-6
2025-04-19vs Harris/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Maddox / Elizabeth Waide vs Aubrey Vick / Samantha Feuer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesRebecca Bender vs Holly Hoyle6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJamie Iverson / LeAnn Waide vs Megan Campbell / Lauren Goodman6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-29vs Brill-Shuman/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Waide / Jamie Iverson vs Elsa Roland / Tracy Polite2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesLeAnn Waide vs Natalia Ward2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKim Huinker / Alyssa Maddox vs Annette Thompson / Betsy Wood7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Harris/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKim Huinker / Alaina Smith vs Aubrey Vick / Windsor Wall6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRebecca Bender vs Emilie Harris6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJamie Iverson / Meg Stratton vs Laurel Martin / Samantha Feuer3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Rebecca Bender
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.23
LeAnn Waide
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.23
Alaina Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Kim Huinker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Jamie Iverson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.04
Meg Stratton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.90
Alyssa Maddox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Waide
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meg Stratton + Kim Huinker2346% games+4.2% vs expected
LeAnn Waide + Jamie Iverson2445% games−2.2% vs expected
LeAnn Waide + Kim Huinker2541% games−4.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Waide + Jamie Iverson224 matchesnot enough data
LeAnn Waide + Alaina Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Iverson + Meg Stratton044 matchesnot enough data
Jamie Iverson + Alyssa Maddox134 matchesnot enough data
Kim Huinker + Alyssa Maddox134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Bender
23W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
LeAnn Waide
8W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Alaina Smith
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Kim Huinker
6W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Jamie Iverson
5W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
Meg Stratton
3W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Alyssa Maddox
3W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Elizabeth Waide
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.