Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 55AW9.0A

2024 ADULT 55&Over · Women 9.0

19 players · average NTRP 4.14 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Malaika Stoll
published
4.13
Val Lacommare
published
4.05
Anita Kressner
published 4.5
4.05
Donna Himenez
published 4
4.02
Michelle McDermott
published
3.98
Kal Peters
published
3.96
Laura Norden
published
3.95
Renee Nickerson
published
3.93
Allyson Berry
published 4.5
3.90
Janell Mollenhauer
published
3.89
Sharon Ressa
published
3.84
Kristen Foster
published
3.82
Laurie Radanovich
published
3.76
Shay Martin
published
3.76
Heidi Belton
published 4
3.75
3.74
Molly Brostrom
published
3.64
Donna Vis
published 4
3.60
Darcy Beauchemin
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Himenez + Heidi Belton7161% games+2.1% vs expected
Michelle McDermott + Laura Norden4649% games−3.2% vs expected
Donna Vis + Sharon Ressa4162% gamesnot enough data
Sharon Ressa + Laurie Radanovich224 matchesnot enough data
Anita Kressner + Molly Brostrom123 matchesnot enough data
Val Lacommare + Kal Peters123 matchesnot enough data
Shay Martin + Darcy Beauchemin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Malaika Stoll
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
4.26
Val Lacommare
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Anita Kressner
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
4
Donna Himenez
13W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
4.05
Michelle McDermott
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
44%55%<1%
4.02
Kal Peters
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
57%43%<1%
3.98
Laura Norden
11W–22L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
3.96
Renee Nickerson
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
4.5
Allyson Berry
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.93
Janell Mollenhauer
22W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.90
Sharon Ressa
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.89
Kristen Foster
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.84
Laurie Radanovich
44W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.82
Shay Martin
19W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Heidi Belton
27W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christine Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Molly Brostrom
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
3.74
4
Donna Vis
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Darcy Beauchemin
23W–13L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.