Teams

Midtown/Correa

2025 Broward Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-02vs Parkland/SanabriaLost 01
L#3 DoublesArturo Garcia Alcocer / Tae Park vs MARCOS URRA / Juan Rosas0-6, 5-7
2025-08-26vs Broward/ThackerLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Vazquez / William Krinickas vs Nolan Sutker / Devendra Joshi4-6, 2-6
2025-07-29vs Ltc/FormanWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlexander Ruiz / Peter Vazquez vs Michael OMahony / Brooks Yarbrough2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-07-28vs Parkland/SanabriaWon 10
W#3 DoublesPablo Lima / Tae Park vs MARCOS URRA / Juan Rosas5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-07-23vs Broward/ThackerSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAlexander Ruiz / Peter Vazquez vs Schubert Sengupta / Miguel Agreda7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAndres Moreno / Javier Irizarry vs Damian Thacker / Ariel Bazail0-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Peter Vazquez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.24
Pablo Lima
published
3.23
Andres Moreno
published 3.5
3.22
Nicolas Lievano
published
3.18
Mario Correa
published
3.15
Alkesh Mevada
published 3.5
3.09
Rodrigo Yervis
published
3.08
Javier Irizarry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
2.95
PEDRO HOMES
published
2.93
Andres Intriago
published 3
2.81
2.74
Tae Park
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Dean Gaveau
published 3
Mariano Bosaz
published
Romulo Polo
published
William Krinickas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tae Park + Javier Irizarry4355% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Peter Vazquez
112W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.61
Pablo Lima
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Andres Moreno
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Nicolas Lievano
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Mario Correa
2W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Alkesh Mevada
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.15
Rodrigo Yervis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Javier Irizarry
51W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Julio Gomez Madrigal
7W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
PEDRO HOMES
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Andres Intriago
9W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Arturo Garcia Alcocer
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Tae Park
37W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Dean Gaveau
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Mariano Bosaz
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Romulo Polo
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
William Krinickas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.