Teams

Bautista - Deez Netz

2025 Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over · Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-14vs Team SloaneWon 10
W#2 DoublesDavid Flage / Leonard Tetteh vs Matthew Mazzoni / Ken Soliday6-1, 6-3
2025-07-07vs Team SloaneWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Stoney / Jonathan Santos vs Michael Tenn / Matthew Mazzoni6-4, 6-3
2025-06-30vs Team SloaneWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Chandler / Rainfredo Bautista vs Hank Brooks / Michael Tenn6-3, 6-3
2025-06-23vs Team SloaneWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonathan Santos / Leonard Tetteh vs David Sloane / David Slack6-3, 6-3
2025-06-17vs Team SloaneWon 10
W#3 DoublesJonathan Santos / Leonard Tetteh vs David Slack / David Sloane6-2, 6-1
2025-06-09vs Team SloaneWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Hall / Cleophas D'Auvergne vs Hank Brooks / Ken Soliday6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRamel Bautista / Michael Stoney vs David Slack / Michael Tenn6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRainfredo Bautista / David Flage vs David Sloane / Giovanni Donatelli6-2, 6-2
2025-06-02vs Team SloaneWon 40
W#1 DoublesJohn Chandler / Cleophas D'Auvergne vs Brandon Beavers / Giovanni Donatelli6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDavid Flage vs Miki Mizuki6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRamel Bautista / Rainfredo Bautista vs Rodney Malone / David Sloane7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWilliam Hall / Michael Stoney vs Matthew Mazzoni / Cheng Tung6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Hampton Roads Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.31
Leonard Tetteh
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Cleophas D'Auvergne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
David Flage
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Jonathan Santos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
John Chandler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Justin McDaniel
published
Michael Stoney
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rainfredo Bautista
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Ramel Bautista
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Leonard Tetteh
338W–208L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Cleophas D'Auvergne
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
David Flage
5W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jonathan Santos
74W–27L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
John Chandler
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Justin McDaniel
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Stoney
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rainfredo Bautista
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ramel Bautista
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.