Teams

Freed/40/7.5 Combo/WS

OBX COMBO 40 & OVER · 7.5 MEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-26vs Acree/40/7.5 /WestsideWon 21
W#1 DoublesGregory Wills / Martin Barnette vs Brian Hunsicker / Mark Massey4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Sellers / John Leatherwood vs Daniel Smith / Tom Acree2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Freed / Jeffrey Haskett vs Amit Gupta / Ralph Webster6-2, 6-3
2026-08-19vs Acree/40/7.5 /WestsideLost 03
L#1 DoublesGregory Wills / Martin Barnette vs Mark Massey / Brian Rubino0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Freed / John del Vecchio vs Brian Hunsicker / Mark Preisser3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Leatherwood / Ian Gale vs Tom Acree / Ralph Webster3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 MEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Martin Barnette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
David Hurley
published 3.5
3.25
John Leatherwood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
William Freed
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Mark Sellers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Jeffrey Haskett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Gregory Wills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
John del Vecchio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ian Gale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Freed + John Leatherwood044 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Haskett + William Freed123 matchesnot enough data
Jeffrey Haskett + Gregory Wills123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martin Barnette
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
3.5
David Hurley
17W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
John Leatherwood
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
William Freed
14W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Mark Sellers
12W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.20
Jeffrey Haskett
6W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20
Gregory Wills
15W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
John del Vecchio
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Ian Gale
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.