Teams

A55 6.0M TP Fox

2022 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Men

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-27vs A55 6.0M TP BassakWon 21
W#1 DoublesWilliam Fox / Curt Binder vs Tavi Muresan / Harvey Krieger6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJohn Guran / Kenneth Anderson vs John Beese / Mark Caldwell6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrian Moore / Arthur Busch vs Ronald Bassak / Gary Worner6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2022-06-20vs OH A55 6.0M WarnerLost 03
L#1 DoublesCurt Binder / William Fox vs Timothy Booher / Craig Warner2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRich Herbruck / Kenneth Anderson vs Randall Fairfax / Troy Smith1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Moore / Arthur Busch vs Vince Cheverine / Patrick Fojas1-6, 2-6
2022-06-13vs A55 6.0M NR CortsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Guran / Brian Moore vs Robert Rosenau / William Farr0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesArthur Busch / John Anderson vs Lars Traner / Ben Zagorski4-6, 3-6
2022-06-06vs A55 6.0M TP BassakLost 02
L#1 DoublesRich Herbruck / John Anderson vs Dave Mendenhall / Randy Reese2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCurt Binder / John Guran vs Ronald Bassak / Raymond Vanaman3-6, 4-6
2022-05-23vs OH A55 6.0M WarnerLost 12
L#1 DoublesRich Herbruck / John Anderson vs Timothy Booher / Troy Smith2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Fox / Dennis Virdo vs Michael Earnest / John Consilio7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBrian Moore / Arthur Busch vs Craig Warner / Patrick Fojas1-6, 4-6
2022-05-16vs A55 6.0M NR CortsLost 01
L#3 DoublesArthur Busch / John Anderson vs Clem Kissling / Gary Montgomery2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · NEOTA A55&O 6.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OH A55 6.0M Warner601627116
2A55 6.0M NR Corts3310818152
3A55 6.0M TP Bassak2471123167
4A55 6.0M TP Fox1531531199

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.64
Arthur Busch
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Dennis Virdo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
John Guran
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Curt Binder
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rich Herbruck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Arthur Busch
20W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Dennis Virdo
36W–85L career · 1 line in 2022
26%74%<1%
2.58
John Guran
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
Curt Binder
21W–25L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rich Herbruck
26W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.