← Teams

PTC-Parkhurst/Oberlander

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.35 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Shiloh Halsey
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.28
Stefano Cavallucci
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Christopher Robbins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
John Boelling
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
Xavier Oberlander
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Ken Dragoon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Michael Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
—
John Nee
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
—
Sam Chase
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Michael Parkhurst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-07-18Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesStefano Cavallucci / Christopher Robbins vs Shawn Boyce / Sheldon Sun6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKen Dragoon / Xavier Oberlander vs Donny Cablao / Rajan Madhusudan6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Nee / Chip Rosenfeld vs Anish Vidyarthi / Joshua Tran6-2, 6-1
2021-07-11Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesChristopher Robbins / John Baker vs Dan Tracy / Nick Hooker6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesXavier Oberlander vs Brenner Daniels2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJohn Boelling / Andrew Daddio vs Eric Anderson / Jason Hyde6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Parkhurst / Chip Rosenfeld vs Greg Culver / David Bender6-0, 6-3
2021-06-26Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesXavier Oberlander / John Nee vs Frederick Buckman / Kent Wall6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Navarro / Sam Chase vs Matthew Casimo / Darren Malinoski6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Parkhurst / Andrew Daddio vs Steven Christenson / James Thomas6-3, 6-1
2021-06-13Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesShiloh Halsey / Stefano Cavallucci vs Rolf Ellingsen / John Wallin7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJohn Boelling vs Hayward Reed2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSam Chase / Ken Dragoon vs John Hapke / Mark Muckerheide6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndrew Daddio / Michael Parkhurst vs Loren Davis / Kimbal Logan6-2, 6-1
2021-06-11Won 3–1
L#1 DoublesXavier Oberlander / Ken Dragoon vs Paul Stutzman / Matt Thayer6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesShiloh Halsey vs Janis Locenieks6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStefano Cavallucci / Andrew Daddio vs Piero Fenato / John Lekas7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSam Chase / Michael Navarro vs Patrick Kirk / Richard Jennings7-5, 7-6
2021-06-06Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesStefano Cavallucci / Christopher Robbins vs Hoover Li / Kok Waii Wong6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJohn Boelling vs Andalib Khan3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSam Chase / Chip Rosenfeld vs Kirk Planck / NANDA SIDDAIAH6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Parkhurst / Ken Dragoon vs Masafumi Inoue / Robert Truong6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Shiloh Halsey
45W–33L career · type A
45%55%0%
3.46
3.5
Stefano Cavallucci
91W–58L career
1%98%1%
3.28
3.5
Christopher Robbins
15W–30L career
not enough data
—
3.5
John Boelling
44W–51L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Xavier Oberlander
27W–49L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Ken Dragoon
67W–93L career
5%95%0%
3.18
3
Michael Navarro
27W–39L career
0%97%3%
2.85
3
John Nee
38W–66L career
not enough data
—
3
Sam Chase
8W–32L career
not enough data
—
3
Michael Parkhurst
40W–84L career
15%85%0%
2.60

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.