Teams

Alberta Banks-Coffee

2024 · 25 NEGTA USTA Mixed 40 & Over - Fall

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-12vs NEGTA/Jody NievesLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Raper / Sandy McQueen vs Bill Gaynor / Theresa Rigney1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Coffee / Steven Kovach vs Christopher Corwin / Anna Crockett0-1
2024-12-11vs NEGTA/Jody NievesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesArpit Bhoti / Sandy McQueen vs Hrishi Talwar / Lindsey Bristow1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Coffee / Marvin Wendorf vs Theresa Rigney / Reid Nix2-0
2024-11-21vs NEGTA/Jody NievesLost 03
L#1 DoublesArpit Bhoti / Shawn Davis vs Andy Johnson / Jody Nieves0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSteven Kovach / Sandy McQueen vs Bill Gaynor / Soomy Sim3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Raper / Lisa Coffee vs Mark Dubin / Amy Quinn1-6, 0-6
2024-11-21vs NEGTA/Jody NievesLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Coffee / Arpit Bhoti vs Lindsey Bristow / Hrishi Talwar0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrian Raper / Tammy Raper vs Kenny Morgan / Anna Crockett2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSandy McQueen / Marvin Wendorf vs Soomy Sim / Mark Dubin1-6, 4-6
2024-11-07vs NEGTA/Jody NievesLost 12
L#1 DoublesSteven Kovach / Melissa Degroot vs Sharon Ross / Reid Nix4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Raper / Brian Raper vs Christopher Corwin / Amy Quinn3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSandy McQueen / Marvin Wendorf vs Jason Gaston / Jody Nieves4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 25 NEGTA USTA Mixed 40 & Over - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEGTA/Jody Nieves50132565
2Alberta Banks-Coffee0521327167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Sandy McQueen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.66
Arpit Bhoti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.34
Marvin Wendorf
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Tammy Raper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Brian Raper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Lisa Coffee
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
Melissa Degroot
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Triano
published
Steven Kovach
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy McQueen
79W–40L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.78
4
Arpit Bhoti
61W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
Marvin Wendorf
54W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.34
Tammy Raper
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.27
3.5
Brian Raper
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Coffee
12W–16L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Degroot
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Triano
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Kovach
36W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.