Teams

MT/BERGHOLD/TRILEVEL/W3.0/3.5/4.0

2025 Tri Level · Tri Level Bozeman Women 3.0

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-10vs Hit N RunLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Helton / Brandi Leedham-Erwin vs Stacie Wunsch / Kirsten Kainz4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Berghold / Diana Saros vs Sarah Hamilton / Elisabeth Souther6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria King / Elizabeth Zimney vs Judy Lazaro / Emily Davis4-6, 2-6
2025-08-10vs Hit N RunWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Helton / Brandi Leedham-Erwin vs Kirsten Kainz / Stacie Wunsch6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Saros / Amy Berghold vs Sarah Hamilton / Elisabeth Souther7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Zimney / Maria King vs Judy Lazaro / Emily Davis5-7, 4-6
2025-08-09vs Hit N RunWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Helton / Brandi Leedham-Erwin vs Stacie Wunsch / Kirsten Kainz6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Berghold / Diana Saros vs Sarah Hamilton / Elisabeth Souther6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMaria King / Elizabeth Zimney vs Emily Davis / Judy Lazaro7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri Level Bozeman Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Brandi Leedham-Erwin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.23
Amy Berghold
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Maria King
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Diana Saros
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Elizabeth Helton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Zimney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Saros + Amy Berghold4149% games−5.0% vs expected
Amy Berghold + Maria King314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Helton + Brandi Leedham-Erwin213 matchesnot enough data
Maria King + Elizabeth Zimney033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brandi Leedham-Erwin
137W–92L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Amy Berghold
27W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Maria King
17W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Diana Saros
20W–15L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Elizabeth Helton
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Zimney
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.