Teams

Hammond

2022 WI Other · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 7.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior

8 players · average NTRP 3.62 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-10-09vs SiehoffWon 21
W#1 DoublesDavid Gahagan / Zita Wenda vs James Lambiris / Kathy Kort8-2
W#2 DoublesKen Redman / Amy Buege vs Paul Lickteig / PATRICIA EICHTEN8-6
L#3 DoublesKevin Struck / Christine Frank vs John Plotkin / Melanie Kuzmanovic7-9
2022-10-09vs ArmitageWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Gahagan / Zita Wenda vs Theresa Palasota / Tom Leggett9-7
W#2 DoublesKen Redman / Amy Buege vs Lynn Armitage / John Cao8-4
W#3 DoublesKevin Struck / Christine Frank vs Michael Finnegan / Karelyn Hopkins8-6
2022-10-09vs RichmondLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Gahagan / Zita Wenda vs Linda Match / Richard Vincent8-6
L#2 DoublesKevin Struck / Christine Frank vs David Feiss / Patricia Hanz5-8
L#3 DoublesTodd Hammond / Amy Buege vs Maurice Russell / Kathryn Tweet5-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2022 WI Adult 55+ 7.0 Mixed Weekend Warrior
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hammond2163356
2Richmond2163346
3Armitage2154451
4Siehoff0318872

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Amy Buege
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.36
Debbie Ruplinger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
David Gahagan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Todd Hammond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Kevin Struck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Zita Wenda
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Christine Frank
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Ken Redman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zita Wenda + Debbie Ruplinger16457% games+8.9% vs expected
David Gahagan + Todd Hammond2549% games−1.7% vs expected
Kevin Struck + Ken Redman6261% gamesnot enough data
Zita Wenda + David Gahagan303 matchesnot enough data
Christine Frank + Kevin Struck123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Buege
41W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Debbie Ruplinger
132W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
David Gahagan
75W–57L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Todd Hammond
54W–101L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Kevin Struck
46W–45L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Zita Wenda
130W–108L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Christine Frank
73W–159L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
Ken Redman
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.