Teams

Me.Dougher18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-28vs Su.Potter18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesAna Marshall vs Darrena Yehia6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesCaroline Dougherty vs Jennifer Bent6-1, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAmy Whitaker vs Miriam Nuffer5-7, 1-6
2025-07-14vs Me.McCaskill18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesThea McNeill vs Austin Coley4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCaroline Dougherty vs Scottie Littlewood1-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs Ja.Stephan18SLost 12
L#1 SinglesAna Marshall vs Jennifer Lasater5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMelissa Dougher vs Rebekah Noulles1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCaroline Dougherty vs Kendall King2-6, 4-6
2025-06-23Won 10
W#1 SinglesThea McNeill vs Heather Russell6-1, 6-1
2025-06-16vs An.Acharya18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesAna Marshall vs Hollyanne Compton7-5, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAmy Whitaker vs Pamela Stephens6-2, 6-1
2025-06-09vs He.Suke18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesAmy Whitaker vs Ashley Randall0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesCaroline Dougherty vs Geri Russell0-6, 1-6
2025-06-02vs Au.Beam18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesMccall Moore vs Allison Shipe6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesElizabeth Fogleman vs Lauren Warren6-2, 6-1
L#3 SinglesAna Marshall vs Molly Lewis4-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Thea McNeill
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.65
Katherine Carver
published
2.60
Mccall Moore
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.51
Elizabeth Fogleman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.35
Ana Marshall
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Caroline Dougherty
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.17
Melissa Dougher
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.13
Amy Whitaker
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Dougher + Amy Whitaker224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Thea McNeill
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Katherine Carver
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Mccall Moore
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Elizabeth Fogleman
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
2.5
Ana Marshall
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Caroline Dougherty
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Dougher
12W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Amy Whitaker
7W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.