Teams

BBlackburn.55C-CHTC

2026 Eno River Combo 55 & Over · 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-09-01vs EBlount.55.8.5C-HRLost 12
L#1 DoublesGabriel Dichter / Chris Combs vs Eddie Blount / William Calhoun2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNathan Bearman / Alexis Maklakoff vs Erik J Erikson / Eric Lindblom3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJOE BERTON / Jason Moon vs Jon Koceja / Jon Post7-6, 6-2
2026-08-25vs EBlount.55.8.5C-HRLost 12
L#1 DoublesJason Moon / Bill Rader vs Jon Koceja / Hien Jimmy Nguyen5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGabriel Dichter / Wendell Gilland vs William Calhoun / Mark Stone6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBoyd Blackburn / Nathan Bearman vs Erik J Erikson / David Grose3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Combo 8.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
David Hamrin
published 4.5
4.16
Gabriel Dichter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.05
Boyd Blackburn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Alexis Maklakoff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.94
Sudhanshu Handa
published
3.91
Bill Rader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Nathan Bearman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Wendell Gilland
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.83
Chris Combs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
JOE BERTON
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Scott Beddingfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jason Moon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendell Gilland + JOE BERTON4261% games+5.7% vs expected
Nathan Bearman + Chris Combs7062% games+1.3% vs expected
Boyd Blackburn + Sudhanshu Handa2540% gamesnot enough data
Boyd Blackburn + Nathan Bearman2446% gamesnot enough data
Alexis Maklakoff + Nathan Bearman314 matchesnot enough data
Alexis Maklakoff + Gabriel Dichter224 matchesnot enough data
Nathan Bearman + Sudhanshu Handa303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Hamrin
6W–5L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Gabriel Dichter
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Boyd Blackburn
110W–117L career · 1 line in 2026
35%65%<1%
4.05
4.5
Alexis Maklakoff
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
4.01
Sudhanshu Handa
34W–17L career · no lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
3.94
4
Bill Rader
7W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.91
4
Nathan Bearman
119W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Wendell Gilland
24W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Chris Combs
46W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
4
JOE BERTON
21W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Scott Beddingfield
64W–75L career · 3 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
Jason Moon
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.