Teams

SFV - LLW-Rally Girls/Golbert

2025 Adult 18 Weekday SFV · SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-13vs SFV - Volley VixensSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Waugh / Deidre Hope vs Cheryl Stolarski / Nicole Emmons6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDeborah Anderson vs Angelina Smith0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Magalski / Lauren Davidson vs Jennifer Orwin / Sahar Khedher6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Palacios / Leslie Byrum vs Kindra Raymond / Kimberly Pearlman6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ WeekDay - 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Renee Volpei
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.02
Venita Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.99
Nicole Romanelli
published
2.94
Kathryn Stefani
published
2.86
Jennifer Waugh
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Amy Randles
published 3
2.84
Deborah Anderson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.80
Teresa Hatch
published
2.79
Deidre Hope
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Leslie Byrum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Jenny Killgore
published
2.48
Linda Palacios
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Bella Soroko
published 3
2.42
Carol Magalski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.17
Janet Winkes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deidre Hope + Venita Ryan3546% games+7.8% vs expected
Venita Ryan + Nicole Romanelli14658% games+7.1% vs expected
Linda Palacios + Leslie Byrum3353% games+4.7% vs expected
Renee Volpei + Venita Ryan16760% games+2.7% vs expected
Jennifer Waugh + Kathryn Stefani404 matchesnot enough data
Carol Magalski + Linda Palacios213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Renee Volpei
93W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
3
Venita Ryan
128W–97L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Nicole Romanelli
29W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Kathryn Stefani
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jennifer Waugh
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Amy Randles
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Deborah Anderson
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Teresa Hatch
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.80
3
Deidre Hope
20W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Leslie Byrum
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Jenny Killgore
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
Linda Palacios
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Bella Soroko
0W–9L career · no lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Carol Magalski
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
Janet Winkes
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.