Teams

SS-D BLUE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 2.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-31vs GAC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesLyndsie VandenBerg / Betsy Maletz vs Krissa Murphy / Jennifer Peters2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesSydni Sachs vs Molly Robbins1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Bischoff / Bridget van Cleave vs Ashley Balakas / Katie Agresta0-6, 1-6
2023-05-24vs HW REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Davis / Carrie Moss vs Debora Rewerts / Bridgette Ward3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMegan Barley vs Margaret Lee0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Maletz / Sydni Sachs vs Jessica Garnreiter / Tisha Smith5-7, 4-6
2023-05-18vs SS-H GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesSydni Sachs / Lyndsie VandenBerg vs Maria Shea / Danielle Panzarino1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBetsy Maletz vs Marsha Visscher6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarrie Moss / Emily Bischoff vs Dana McHale / Tricia Lowe0-6, 0-6
2023-05-15vs EM BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesCarrie Moss / Sydni Sachs vs Amy Dodge / Hillary Cecil1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesEmily Bischoff vs Joy Jensen1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Davis / Megan Barley vs Lisa LoJacono / Martha Scanlan0-6, 0-6
2023-05-03vs HV BLUELost 03
L#1 DoublesMegan Barley / Sydni Sachs vs Wendy Stookesberry / Susan Payne1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBetsy Maletz vs Kellina Flansburg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLyndsie VandenBerg / Emily Bischoff vs Anne Campbell / Laurie Korff1-6, 0-6
2023-04-27vs HFII REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Moss / Lindsay Huthoefer vs Kathy Hoover / Tricia Lyons1-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesBetsy Maletz vs Cindy Holmes6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEmily Bischoff / Sydni Sachs vs Tracy Rutz / Katie Vail3-6, 0-6
2023-04-26vs HG GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBetsy Maletz / Bridget van Cleave vs Katie Mercier / Marisa Benway7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarrie Moss / Megan Barley vs Tammi Farrelly / Nancy Seavall2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings48 teams · WOMEN 2.5 - 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WP SILVER7029622248
2HRCA-N ORANGE7026925258
3CACI YELLOW6021924236
4KC-CC GOLD6128720241
5CACM SILVER6127820241
6MEA SILVER6126925269
7KC-RH SILVER61211431270
8DCC GREEN61221333278
9VCC ORANGE61191639320
10KC-CC BLACK52211432284
11BTA-C PURPLE52211433279
12HRCA-S SILVER52221333282
13BCC BLUE52201535285
14DTC PURPLE52201535286
15GTC PURPLE52181739304
16PH NAVY42181229262
17WP GOLD43191636297
18NJ MAROON43191636310
19CACI GOLD43181737289
20MEA PINK43191639310
21WP-B ORANGE43191642333
22ATC RED34171838323
23CACM BLACK34181740313
24LEBTC SILVER34161945336
25BRMST PINK34142146342
26BCC RED34142147347
27HW TEAL24141635278
28HFII GREEN24121841297
29GCC NAVY25142145323
30LTC-M GREEN25132249343
31CPV RED25122350354
32CP GOLD25122351359
33APR-U YELLOW25122352349
34BTA-C RED25112453381
35GPTC YELLOW25112453369
36SS-D YELLOW15102045327
37LAC RED16132246360
38SKY TEAL16142147332
39CHCC BLUE16122348334
40HRCA-S YELLOW16122349362
41SS-D BLUE16112450347
42PCRK RED16132250362
43MC YELLOW16122353351
44RMTC SILVER1692654358
45LTC-M BLUE1682757396
46KNO PINK1682760394
47RMTC PINK0792654376
48SS-LT ORANGE0753060374

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Betsy Maletz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.37
Emily Bischoff
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
Bridget van Cleave
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.16
Megan Barley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.12
Sydni Sachs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.12
Carrie Moss
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
2.08
Lyndsie VandenBerg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyndsie VandenBerg + Sydni Sachs3344% games+7.1% vs expected
Emily Bischoff + Carrie Moss2340% games+5.5% vs expected
Emily Bischoff + Lyndsie VandenBerg134 matchesnot enough data
Emily Bischoff + Megan Barley134 matchesnot enough data
Sydni Sachs + Megan Barley134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Betsy Maletz
12W–13L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Emily Bischoff
21W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Bridget van Cleave
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Megan Barley
17W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Sydni Sachs
12W–25L career · 6 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.12
2.5
Carrie Moss
13W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Lyndsie VandenBerg
10W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.