Teams

KY/LOU/MIESNER

2023 USTA MIXED 40 & Over · 8.0 ADULT MIXED

17 players · average NTRP 4.20 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-08-01vs KY/LOU/VOSS/GORDINIERWon 10
W#1 DoublesDonna Mink / Todd Stasko vs Stuart Winchell / Brenda Stofer7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2023-06-07vs KY/LOU/MAY/MCCOYWon 10
W#3 DoublesDonna Mink / Jason Rice vs Jatin Parmar / Julie Adams7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 ADULT MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Brian Zipse
published 4.5
4.05
Clark Stone
published 4.5
4.02
Noel Kaufmann
published
3.98
Russell Miesner
published
3.88
Helen Dashti
published
3.83
Thomas Knepshield
published
3.82
Jody Shaikun
published
3.81
Jerry Seay
published
3.79
Martha Stephenson
published
3.78
Donna Mink
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.75
Denise Roby
published 4
3.65
Benjamin Hill
published 4
3.59
Denise Hartmann
published 4
3.36
Meg Shonkwiler
published
3.28
Mitchell Fain
published
Stacey Rice
published
Todd Stasko
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Hartmann + Russell Miesner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brian Zipse
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Clark Stone
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
4.05
Noel Kaufmann
26W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
4.02
Russell Miesner
36W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.98
Helen Dashti
25W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.88
Thomas Knepshield
14W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.83
Jody Shaikun
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.82
Jerry Seay
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.81
Martha Stephenson
23W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Donna Mink
107W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Denise Roby
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Benjamin Hill
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Denise Hartmann
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
3.59
Meg Shonkwiler
17W–10L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.36
Mitchell Fain
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
Stacey Rice
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd Stasko
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.