Teams

Ke.Williams18T

2025 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-30vs Ca.Novak18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesDara Haney / Christine Bass vs Judith Stewart / Amanda Lindsay1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-23Won 10
W#1 DoublesKelli Williams / Dara Haney vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-26vs Sa.Wood18TWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Sutton / Christine Bass vs Deanna Lape / Holly Santago6-4, 6-3
2025-06-17vs As.McCollum18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelli Williams / Christine Bass vs Sharyn Leaver / Emily Kendall2-6, 2-6
2025-06-12vs Ca.Rice18TWon 10
W#1 DoublesDara Haney / Kelli Williams vs Carrie Rice / Connie Haynes6-3, 6-3
2025-06-02vs Am.Cuni18TWon 10
W#1 DoublesDara Haney / Kelly Sutton vs Amy Cuni / Kaitlin Johnston6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Dara Haney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Christine Bass
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Susan Haughney
published
3.07
Susan Wilkerson
published
3.03
Kelly Sutton
published
2.82
Beth Robertson
published 3
2.76
Anne Mueller
published 3
2.76
Tami Hollingsworth
published
2.54
Sarah Cooke
published
2.48
Arin Vaughan
published 2.5
2.27
Kenna Haney
published
2.15
Patricia Haver
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dara Haney + Kelly Sutton5159% games+4.7% vs expected
Anne Mueller + Beth Robertson1441% games−2.9% vs expected
Christine Bass + Dara Haney3250% gamesnot enough data
Susan Wilkerson + Anne Mueller1441% gamesnot enough data
Dara Haney + Beth Robertson404 matchesnot enough data
Susan Wilkerson + Dara Haney303 matchesnot enough data
Anne Mueller + Susan Haughney123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dara Haney
188W–138L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Christine Bass
78W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.13
Susan Haughney
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
22%77%<1%
3.11
Susan Wilkerson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
Kelly Sutton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Beth Robertson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Anne Mueller
5W–16L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Tami Hollingsworth
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Sarah Cooke
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Arin Vaughan
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
Kenna Haney
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27
Patricia Haver
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.