Teams

University Park Lundin

2026 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over Winter · 6.0 W Monday

13 players · average NTRP 2.83 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-23vs Meadows Ladies 6.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Berkman / Alison Sackley vs Colleen Quinn / Gwyned Simpson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Lundin / Kathleen Levinstim vs Cathy Belton / Gwen Krivi6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBernadette Venkataraman / Dawn Zimmerman vs Linda Sischy / Tricia Skelly6-1, 7-6
2026-03-09vs LWR Passion RedsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Lundin / Kathleen Levinstim vs Victoria Herman / Melissa Perella1-6, 4-6
2026-03-02vs LBK Public SmithWon 10
W#3 DoublesSandra Lundin / Kathleen Levinstim vs Rebecca Schlecht / Wendy Stricker6-0, 6-0
2026-02-23vs TPC Racquet Rebels 55Won 30
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Berkman / Alison Sackley vs Laurie Ramocki / Kristine Tabone6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSandy Pepin / Karen Giffin vs Theresa Chick / Eileen Grossman6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSandra Lundin / Kathleen Levinstim vs Nancy Capece / Julie Faulkner6-4, 6-3
2026-02-16vs LBK Club Lucky StringsLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Berkman / Alison Sackley vs Johane Aertker / Lois Karran7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Giffin / Sandy Pepin vs Jana Bekavac / Susan Pluss3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWendi Rocovich / Judith Stanley vs Holly Geary / Geri Brown4-6, 1-6
2026-02-09vs Sarasota/AlsterLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandy Pepin / Karen Giffin vs Patricia Winn / DENISE NEVILLE6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Berkman / Alison Sackley vs Ann White / Sophia Janson4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRosetta Waag / Dawn Zimmerman vs Dawn Kurc / Florie Black2-6, 4-6
2026-02-02vs TPC TruexLost 03
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Berkman / Alison Sackley vs Donna Truex / Pam Howard4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Giffin / Sandra Lundin vs Lorraine Forzani / Diane da Costa1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBernadette Venkataraman / Shearl Johnson vs Alina Doreste-Johnson / Susan Mihm1-6, 2-6
2026-01-26vs LBK Club Serling/MuthWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaren Giffin / Sandy Pepin vs Jill Serling / Elizabeth Jantsch0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRosetta Waag / Shearl Johnson vs Beth Shribman / Michelle Harkins7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBernadette Venkataraman / Wendi Rocovich vs Judy Mitchell / Kim Bohl4-6, 4-6
2026-01-19vs Payne Park HuelsterSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJudith Stanley / Karen Giffin vs Sarah Cloud / Christine del Monte3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKathleen Levinstim / Sandra Lundin vs Nancy Lagnese / Susan Stasiak6-4, 6-3
2026-01-12vs River Strand BaigLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandy Pepin / Karen Giffin vs Karen Baig / Kathy Lewis3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Sackley / Elizabeth Berkman vs Sandra Shallcross / Kelly Anderson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Lundin / Rosetta Waag vs Gail Gilmour / Karen Sergison2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dawn Zimmerman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Alison Sackley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.33
Bernadette Venkataraman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Berkman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Judith Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Forde
published
Karen Giffin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kathleen Levinstim
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Rosetta Waag
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sandra Lundin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sandy Pepin
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Shearl Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Wendi Rocovich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Berkman + Alison Sackley5549% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Pepin + Karen Giffin2541% gamesnot enough data
Kathleen Levinstim + Sandra Lundin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dawn Zimmerman
9W–19L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Alison Sackley
5W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
2.5
Bernadette Venkataraman
22W–71L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Elizabeth Berkman
5W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Judith Stanley
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Forde
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karen Giffin
2W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kathleen Levinstim
6W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rosetta Waag
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra Lundin
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandy Pepin
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shearl Johnson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendi Rocovich
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.